Efficacy and Tolerability of Mirtazapine versus Paroxetine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

Author:

Rodriguez Alexandre González1,Ferrer Cristóbal Gastó2,Odriozola Victor Navarro2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Neuroscience Clinic Institute, Hospital Clinic Barcelona.

2. Depression Clinic Program. Department of Psychiatry, Neuroscience Clinic Institute, Hospital Clinic Barcelona.

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy and tolerability of paroxetine and mirtazapine in the treatment of major depression. Data sources Searches were conducted to identify studies through Medline (1980-2011), PsycInfo (1980-2011) and PubMed databases up to June 2011. The searches were not restricted to publication type or clinical trial design. Study Selection A clinical trial was included if it described a trial of paroxetine versus mirtazapine in patients with major depression, based on the research evidence of reviews. Data Abstraction Three assessors analyzed the quality of the trials and extracted study design data, trial features, efficacy and toler-ability assessment tools, discontinuation reasons for both antidepressants and remitter and responder rates. Results We included six randomized controlled trials, one open-label, randomized controlled trial and four systematic reviews and metaanalysis. Rates of remission and response between mirtazapine and paroxetine were compared: at the beginning (1-2 weeks) there were statistically significant differences in mirtazapine treated patients, but these were not found at the end of assessment period (6-8 weeks). Discontinuation rates between the two drugs showed no differences, with an adverse event profile characteristic of each drug. Conclusions Mirtazapine and paroxetine were equally effective and well-tolerated in major depressive disorder. Differences in effectiveness were only observed in the first or second week of treatment when mirtazapine showed earlier onset of action.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3