Abstract
Background: There is no war without catastrophic impacts, not only on humans and states but also on the environment and nature. As with all wars, the question is raised as to whether an invasion or aggression is legitimate according to international law. This research aims to discuss an emerging issue at the international level, which is the responsibility of the aggressor state for the environmental damages incurred by the victim state. This paper discusses the possibility of establishing Russia’s responsibility for the environmental damages incurred in Ukraine. It will also shed light on the possible ways Ukraine may raise Russia’s responsibility, internationally speaking. The novelty of this study stems from its originality – it is the first on this topic in the field of international relations and international law.
Methods: In this research, the author used a case study to provide an in-depth perspective on the responsibility of the invading state for the environmental damages caused to the victim state. Here, the author used a historical and statistical framework to shed light on the impacts of the Russian aggression against Ukraine on the environment. Moreover, analytical and structural methods were deployed to explain the methods by which Ukraine and the international community might establish Russian responsibility for the environmental damages caused by the invasion. To support the ideas discussed in this paper, the author uses legal texts, international conventions, and official reports issued from national and international institutions.
Results and Conclusions: The author found that the Russian aggression against the Ukrainian territory has caused severe environmental damages, which cannot go unpunished. Although traditional international law may be insufficient to punish Russia, customary law, warfare law, and international environmental law include rules that may be used to raise the Russian responsibility for these damages.
Publisher
East-European Law Research Center
Reference33 articles.
1. . Green JA, Henderson C, Ruys T, ‘Russia’s attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum’ (2022) 9(1) Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4-30.
2. 2. Krisch N, ‘After hegemony: the law on the use of force and the Ukraine crisis’ ( EJIL:Talk!, 2 March 2022)
3. 3. Sanger DE, ‘Putin Spins a Conspiracy Theory That Ukraine Is on a Path to Nuclear Weapons’ (New York Times, 23 February 2022)
4. 4. Kaplina O, Kravtsov S, Leyba O, ‘Military Justice in Ukraine: Renaissance During Wartime’ (2022) 3(15) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 120-136.
5. 5. Prytyka Yu, Izarova I, Maliarchuk L, Terekh O, ‘Legal Challenges for Ukraine under Martial Law: Protection of Civil, Property and Labour Rights, Right to a Fair Trial, and Enforcement of Decisions’ 2022 3(15) Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 219-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18- 5.4-n000329
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献