Author:
Raab Stephen S.,Grzybicki Dana Marie,Zarbo Richard J.,Jensen Chris,Geyer Stanley J.,Janosky Janine E.,Meier Frederick A.,Vrbin Colleen M.,Carter Gloria,Geisinger Kim R.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference38 articles.
1. Kitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT. Chapter 7: achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine. 2006; 24(suppl 3):S63-S70.
2. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. Cancer. 2002; 52:342-362.
3. Renshaw AA. An accurate and precise methodology for routine determination of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening. Cancer. 2001; 93:86-92.
4. Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2002: 287:295-304.
5. Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, et al. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006; 367:122-132.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献