Author:
Sargeant Jan,O'Connor Annette,O'Sullivan Terri,Ramirez Alejandro
Abstract
Researchers planning clinical trials should identify the primary trial outcome and adequately power the trial to detect clinically meaningful differences in this outcome. All primary and secondary outcomes and their measurement should be comprehensively described, and their results reported. There is evidence that trials on the same subject use different outcomes or measure the same outcome in different ways, making it difficult to compare intervention effectiveness across clinical trials. Consensus development of core outcome sets could improve consistency in outcome measures used across trials and aid in development of an evidence-based body of literature on intervention effectiveness in swine populations.
Publisher
American Association of Swine Veterinarians
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals
Reference38 articles.
1. 1. Coster WJ. Making the best match: Selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(2):162-170. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.006015
2. 2. Dohoo I, Martin W, Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. 2nd ed. VER Inc; 2009.
3. 3. Sargeant JM, Kelton DF, O'Connor AM. Study designs and systematic review of interventions: Building evidence across study designs. Zoonoses Public Health. 2014;61(Suppl1):10-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12127
4. 4. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N, Kirkham JJ, McNair A, Prinsen CAC, Schmitt J, Terwee CB, Young B. The COMET Handbook: Version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(Suppl3):1-50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4
5. 5. US Food and Drug Administration. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical studies to support effectiveness of new animal drugs. Guidance for Industry #267. Published October 2021. Accessed November 8, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/media/138160/download
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献