Enhanced Regional Clustering Algorithm in Seizure Location Identification
-
Published:2020-12-30
Issue:
Volume:
Page:453-458
-
ISSN:
-
Container-title:Innovations in Information and Communication Technology Series
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IICT
Author:
A Allwyn Gnanadas1, babu Sathish2, Kumar Prince Ashwin Kumar3
Affiliation:
1. KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, India 2. Thanthai Periyar Government Institute of Technology, India 3. Honeywell Technologies,India
Abstract
Epilepsy is a chronic condition that is characterized by frequent occurrence of seizure. The treatment of epilepsy using anticonvulsants that suppress the rapid neuron spikes in brain is promising; however, a permanent fix is always lacked. The region on brain that is responsible for seizure if identified exactly, the diseased area can be expelled and that could be a permanent fix. Generally, IEEG (Intracranial Electroencephalogram) an invasive procedure is adopted to diagnose the location of seizure, though the results are very reliable and considered as a golden standard, the procedure is a complex and risky one. To overcome these difficulties, fMRI (Functional magnetic resonance imaging) is used to read the internal anatomical and metabolic nature of brain, an algorithm (erKNOTS, enhanced regional K based Numbering Out of Time Slices) that analyse each individual voxel is developed and implemented. The result obtained by the developed algorithm is found to be in agreement with those obtained through IEEG. The findings were further validated with Regional homogeneity and Functional connectivity.
Publisher
IJAICT India Publications
Reference16 articles.
1. F. Rosenow, T. Bast, T. Czech, M. Feucht, V. H. Hans, C. Helmstaedter, H.-J. Huppertz, S. Noachtar, F. Oltmanns, T. Polster, M. Seeck, E. Trinka, K. Wagner, and A. Strzelczyk, “Revised version of quality guidelines for presurgical epilepsy evaluation and surgical epilepsy therapy issued by the Austrian, German, and Swiss working group on presurgical epilepsy diagnosis and operative epilepsy treatment,” Epilepsia, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1215–1220, Jun. 2016. 2. M. Centeno, T. M. Tierney, S. Perani, E. A. Shamshiri, K. StPier, C. Wilkinson, D. Konn, T. Banks, S. Vulliemoz, L. Lemieux, R. M. Pressler, C. A. Clark, J. H. Cross, and D. W. Carmichael, “Optimising EEG-fMRI for Localisation of Focal Epilepsy in Children,” PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e0149048, Feb. 2016. 3. L. M. Willems, P. S. Reif, A. Spyrantis, A. Cattani, T. M. Freiman, V. Seifert, M. Wagner, S.-J. You, S. Schubert-Bast, S. Bauer, K. M. Klein, F. Rosenow, and A. Strzelczyk, “Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature,” Epilepsy & Behavior, vol. 91, pp. 30–37, Feb. 2019. 4. K. Gkiatis, K. Bromis, I. Kakkos, I. S. Karanasiou, G. K. Matsopoulos, and K. Garganis, “Effects of Inaccurate Identification of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Concurrent EEG-fMRI,” in J Phys Conf Ser, 2017, vol. 931, no. 1, p. 12042. 5. H. Preissl, C. L. Lowery, and H. Eswaran, “Fetal magnetoencephalography: current progress and trends,” Exp. Neurol., vol. 190, pp. 28–36, 2004.
|
|