Suitability Analysis of Gram Staining with Blood Culture in Bacteremia

Author:

Maulida Eva Nada,Handayani Irda,Kadir Nursin Abdul

Abstract

Bacteremia is a serious bloodstream infection, requiring blood culture as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis and rational therapy, but it is time-consuming. The Gram stain should be considered as an alternative test, as it is easier and faster to determine empirical antibiotic therapy in order to minimize the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study aimed to analyze the suitability of Gram staining results with blood cultures in bacteremia. Cross-sectional study design from August to September 2022 at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and Labuan Baji Hospital, Makassar. The study sample used specimens from automatic positive blood culture bottles of new bacteremia patients. Gram staining and sub-culture were performed to determine the type of Gram-positive or negative bacteria. Appropriate statistical analysis was used to compare the two methods. A total of 78 research samples were obtained. The results of subculture vs. Gram staining showed Gram-positive bacteria in 45 vs. 42 samples and Gram-negative bacteria in 33 vs. 36 samples, respectively. A comparative test using the Wilcoxon test showed no significant difference for the 2 tests, p-value = 0.257 (p > 0.05). The results of the Gram diagnostic test on culture showed high sensitivity and specificity, respectively: 88.9%, and 93.9% for Gram-positive bacteria, 93.9% and 88.9% for Gram-negative bacteria. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 95.32% and 95.32% for Gram-positive, 86.11%, and 95.23 % for Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. There is a suitability between Gram stain and automatic blood culture results with high diagnostic value. Gram staining is expected to be a guide for selecting empirical therapy based on Gram's classification until the AST test results come out.

Publisher

PDS Patklin

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Nain J, Deepashree R, Tamang P, Bhat P, Prakash S, et al. Comparison of four different methods of smear preparation for gram staining of positively flagged automated blood culture bottles. Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine, 2018; 4(2): 98.

2. Improving timelines in reporting results from positive blood cultures: simulation of impact of rapid identification on therapy on a real-life cohort;Cattoir;European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases,2018

3. Becker FG, Cleary M, Team RM, Holtermann H, The D, et al. Permenkes nomor 8 tahun 2015 tentang Program pengendalian resistensi antimikroba di rumah sakit. PERMENKES, 2015; 7(1): 37-72.

4. Salimiyan Rizi K, Farsiani H, Momen Ghalibaf M. Blood culture positive for Gram-positive rods: Contamination or a true infection-a literature review. Reviews in Clinical Medicine, 2021; 8: 2.

5. Rosdiana D, Anggraini D, Balmas M, Effendi D, Bet A. Peningkatan Rasionalitas penggunaan antibiotik pasca implementasi kebijakan penggunaan antimikroba di RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru. Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya, 2018; 36-40.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3