Teaching cataloguing after RDA 3R project

Author:

Kyprianos KonstantinosORCID,Efthymiou FoteiniORCID,Katsira GeorgiaORCID

Abstract

This paper describes how RDA 3R was incorporated into a two-semester cataloguing course syllabus for first-year students and investigates students’ perceptions and feelings about the courses taught. The information gathered will guide the further development and improvement of the course to fully meet the needs of students and the requirements of the market, especially with the emergence of new resource description standards. Following the course teacher’s approval, the researchers distributed questionnaires during class hours. This method ensured that all students participated. The questionnaire was completely anonymous. It included two demographic questions and the CEQ 23 instrument with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Besides that, a self-assessment questionnaire was employed to better understand their confidence in the knowledge gained. Quantitative analysis was carried out on the data related to 63 individual students. The quantitative analysis employed the statistical package SPSS. The findings revealed that students are reasonably confident in their new skills but prefer more practice over theory. Finally, they mentioned that they would like more precise goals and an extension of the courses to three semesters, as the workload is quite heavy. Overall, students feel relatively confident about the knowledge gained and believe they can catalogue in a library setting. The CEQ 23 instrument can be used in various knowledge organisation courses. It can provide a better understanding, with the ultimate goal of changing the curriculum or repurposing information organisation courses, allowing any Library and Information Science (LIS) school to judge the future of studies and their direction.

Publisher

Firenze University Press

Reference28 articles.

1. Al Hijji, Khalfan Zahran, and Omar Sulaiman Fadlallah. 2013. ‘Theory versus Practice in Cataloging Education in Oman: Students’ Perspectives’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51 (8): 929-944. DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2013.832456.

2. Asonitou, Sofia, Athanasios Mandilas, Evangelos Chytis, and Dimitra Latsou. 2018. ‘A Greek Evaluation of the Course Experience Questionnaire: Students’ Conceptions of the Teaching Quality of Higher Education Accounting Studies’. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 11 (2): 51-62. DOI: 10.25103/ijbesar.112.06

3. Ainley, John. 2001. ‘Course Experience Questionnaire 2000: an interim report’. Graduate Careers Council of Australia Ltd. https://www.nagcas.org.au/documents/item/488

4. Byrne, Marann, and Barbara Flood. 2003. ‘Assessing the Teaching Quality of Accounting Programmes: An evaluation of the Course Experience Questionnaire’. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (2): 135-145. DOI: 10.1080/02602930301668

5. Cataloging Competencies Task Force. 2017. ‘Core competencies for cataloging and metadata professional librarians’. ALA ALCTS CaMMS Competencies and Education for a Career in Cataloging Interest Group. http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7853

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3