Affiliation:
1. University of Torino, IT
Abstract
Pierre-Sylvain Régis’s Cartesianism is quite singular in seventeenth-century French philosophy. Though, can we speak of a form of experimental science in Régis’s work? After exploring his notions of ‘system’ and ‘hypothesis’, I will define his position in relation to Claude Perrault, Jacques Rohault, and the Royal Society. I argue, first, that the contrasts which traverse French science are not so much about the use of experiments but about whether or not observational data can be traced back to hypotheses and to a coherent system. Secondly, that we can detect a significant similarity between Boyle’s positions and the views expressed by Perrault and also by Régis. Lastly, that French science, even in its Cartesian version, is much more probabilistic than English experimental philosophy.
Reference38 articles.
1. Anstey, Peter R. 2005. “Experimental vs Speculative Natural Philosophy.” In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, edited by Peter R. Anstey, and John A. Schuster, 215–42. Dordrecht: Springer.
2. Ariew, Roger. 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bayle, Pierre. 1999–2019. Correspondance de Pierre Bayle, édité par Anthony McKenna et al. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
4. Boyle, Robert. 1999–2000. The Works of Robert Boyle, edited by Michael Hunter, and Edward B. Davis. London: Pickering and Chatto.
5. Clarke, Desmond. 1989. Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.