National qualifications frameworks as a policy instrument for lifelong learning in Ghana, Malaysia and Serbia

Author:

Mikulec Borut1ORCID,Howells Alex2ORCID,Mihajlović Dubravka3ORCID,Turiman Punia4,Najah Ellias Nurun4,Douglas Miriam5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Ljubljana, SI

2. University of Hamburg, DE

3. University of Belgrade, RS

4. National University of Malaysia, MY

5. West Liberty University, US

Abstract

The development of national qualifications frameworks (NQFs) around the globe has been influenced by Anglo-Saxon countries and a global policy of intergovernmental organisations. The main aim of this paper is to explore how recently developed NQFs in diverse global con-texts—Ghana, Malaysia, and Serbia—fulfil two proclaimed objectives: recognition of prior learning (RPL) and support for lifelong learning. Based on a comparative analysis of official national and international policy documents relevant to the NQFs in these selected countries, conducted using the method of documentary analysis, our findings indicate that despite dif-ferences according to type, scope, and stage of development, all three NQFs are used as a policy instrument for lifelong learning on the one hand, while on the other hand, they rein-force a vocational perspective of RPL, lifelong learning, and adult education.

Publisher

Firenze University Press

Reference43 articles.

1. Allais S. 2014, Selling out education: National Qualifications Frameworks and the neglect of knowledge, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.

2. — 2017, What does it mean to conduct research into qualifications frameworks?, «Journal of Education and Work», XXX (7), 768-776.

3. Andersson P., Fejes A., Sandberg F. 2013, Introduction: Introducing research on recognition of prior learning, «International Journal of Lifelong Education», XXXII (4), 405-411.

4. ASEAN Qualifications Reference Framework, 2017, <https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/ED-02-ASEAN-Qualifications-Reference-Framework-January-2016.pdf> (07/2020).

5. Biesta G. 2015, On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education, «European Educational Research Journal», XIV (1), 11–22.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3