Results of pelvic exenteration in patients with cervical cancer: clinical experience

Author:

Khakimov Golib A.,Khakimova Gulnoz G.ORCID

Abstract

Background. Despite the progress in pelvic exenteration (PE) technique in international oncological practice, it is still debatable for cancer surgeons. The main reasons for its unpopularity are technical complexity, high rate of intra- and postoperative complications (60%), high postoperative mortality (30%), and challenging postoperative rehabilitation of patients. Aim. To evaluate long-term outcomes after pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer. Materials and methods. From September 2021 to December 2022, 23 PEs were performed, including 12 total and 11 anterior. The mean age was 52.2±10.0 years (range 39–83 years). All patients were diagnosed with locally advanced recurrent cervical cancer: 7 (30%) with stage II, 8 (35%) with stage III, and 8 (35%) with stage IV according to the TNM classification. Histologically, cervical cancer was represented by moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. PE was preceded by the following treatments: neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 17 (74%) patients, surgical treatment in 4 (17%) patients, and chemoradiotherapy in 2 (9%) patients. More than half (56%) of patients achieved grade 2 therapeutic pathomorphism. The advanced disease involved the following adjacent organs: bladder (16; 70%), intestines (13; 56%), uterine endometrium (7; 30%), myometrium and parametrium (4; 17%), fallopian tubes, vagina, and ovary (2; 9%). Results. The average follow-up time for patients was 9.4±8.8 months. Median time to progression – 8.7 months [5.9; 10.8]. During the observation period, 78.3% (18/23) of patients died. Progression was recorded in 39.1% (9/23) of patients. The 1-year overall survival of patients was 38.7% (median 8.9 months). The 1-year tumor-specific survival rate was 60.6% (median 14.1 months). The 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 63.0 and 49.0% (median, 13.4 months), respectively. Conclusion. During the observation period, death occurred in 54.6% (12/23) of cases in the anterior PE group, and in 25% (6/23) in the total group. The median overall survival with anterior PE is 2 times higher compared to total PE (9.6 months versus 4.1 months). Median PFS was 13.4 months. For patients after anterior and total pelvic exenteration, 1-year PFS was 51.9±17.6 and 72.9±13.5; 3-year – 25.9±15.7 and 72.9±13.5 (p=0.178), respectively. Thus, PE is justified and significantly expands the possibilities of surgical treatment.

Publisher

Consilium Medicum

Reference24 articles.

1. New global cancer data. Available at: www.globocan.com. Accessed: 15.12.2022.

2. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, А. О. Шахзадовой. M., 2022 [Sostoianiie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniiu Rossii v 2021 godu. Pod red. AD Kaprina, VV Starinskogo, AO Shakhzadovoi. Moscow, 2022 (in Russian)].

3. Петровский Б. В. Большая медицинская энциклопедия. М., 1986. Т. 27; c. 562-3 [Petrovskii BV. Bol’shaya meditsinskaya entsiklopediya. Moscow, 1986. T. 27; p. 562-3 (in Russian)].

4. Brunschwig A. Complete excision of pelvic viscera for advanced carcinoma. Cancer. 1948;1:177-83.

5. Brunschwig, A. Pelvic exenteration combined with resection of segments of bony pelvis. Surgery. 1969;65(3):417-420.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3