The «obesity paradox» and its degree of proof

Author:

Miklisanskaya S. V.ORCID,Mazur N. A.ORCID,Solomasova L. V.ORCID,Chigineva V. V.ORCID

Abstract

The article gives a critical assessment of the so-called obesity paradox. Methodological errors that occur in the organization of studies that studied the obesity paradox and the formation of comparison groups are highlighted. There are also examples of the disappearance of the obesity paradox when taking into account additional risk factors. The organization of prospective studies or more careful consideration of all currently known risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) will significantly improve the results of the study of the effect of overweight and obesity on mortality in patients with CVD. Thus, despite the biological possibility of the existence of a positive effect of adipose tissue in CVD, the presence of a large number of errors identified in the analysis of the work of researchers obesity paradox require to reconsider the existence of this phenomenon, it should be taken into account the possibility that the obesity paradox may be a consequence of improper design studies to investigate this phenomenon.

Publisher

Consilium Medicum

Subject

General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,History,Family Practice

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3