Abstract
The purpose of this study, to determine the distribution of discourses-promises on transparency in election manifestos of political parties that passed the 10% election threshold in eight general elections according to the distinction of trend slopes, party ideology (right-left) and ruling, opposing party between 1991-2015 in Turkey. Although many qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted in the literature on the effects of the processes and results of the transparency issue after 2000, there is no study encountered analyzing the transparency discourses-promises in the statements. 28 election manifestos were analyzed with content analysis method in terms of “discourse-promise of transparency”. As a result, 258 transparency discourse promises were identified. 146 of them are administrative, 84 are financial and 28 are political transparency. In administrative transparency, providing and obtaining information and the activities of public institutions; in financial transparency, use of resource and bids; in political transparency, in line with the expectations, the discourse-promise of transparency regarding the declaration of property of politicians has come to the fore. Although there is no difference between right and left parties in terms of the discourse-promise of transparency in the statements, especially after 2000, opposition parties have a clear advantage over the ruling parties.
Publisher
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi
Subject
Organic Chemistry,Biochemistry
Reference138 articles.
1. Akçay, E.Y. (2018). Haziran Seçimleri Sürecinde Siyasi Partilerin Seçim Beyannamelerinde Avrupa Birliği ile İlişkiler. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(15), 2175-2192.
2. Alp, H. & Turan, E. (2018). Siyasal Partilerin 24 Haziran 2018 Genel Seçim Beyannamelerinde, Dijital Teknoloji ve İnovasyon Politikalarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Journal Of Social And Humanities Sciences Research, 5(23), 1068-1077.
3. Alpino, M. (2017), On the Electoral Effectiveness of Pre-Election Policy Promises. Access: 18 August 2020, https://ieb.ub.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Alpino.pdf.
4. Altınışık, S. & Songür, N. (2016). 2015 Genel Seçimlerinde Barajı Geçen Partilerin Eğitimin Niteliğine İlişkin Politikalarının Çözümlenmesi. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 1–20.
5. Arklan, Ü. & Tanacı, F. (2020). Seçim Kampanyalarına Beyannameler Bağlamında Bir Bakış: 31 Mart 2019 Yerel Seçimleri Örneğinde Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme. Vizyoner Dergisi, 11(26), 1-29.