Identifying Variation in Intraoperative Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors and Opportunities for Improvement: A Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Analysis

Author:

Lele Abhijit V.12,Vail Emily A.3,O’Reilly-Shah Vikas N.1,DeGraw Xinyao2,Domino Karen B.1,Walters Andrew M.1,Fong Christine T.1,Gomez Courtney1,Naik Bhiken I.4,Mori Makoto5,Schonberger Robert6,Deshpande Ranjit6,Souter Michael J.1,Mathis Michael R.,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

2. Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

3. Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Penn Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

5. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative events and clinical management of deceased organ donors after brain death are poorly characterized and may consequently vary between hospitals and organ procurement organization (OPO) regions. In a multicenter cohort, we sought to estimate the incidence of hypotension and anesthetic and nonanesthetic medication use during organ recovery procedures. METHODS: We used data from electronic anesthetic records generated during organ recovery procedures from brain-dead adults across a Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) cohort of 14 US hospitals and 4 OPO regions (2014–2020). Hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure or MAP <60 mm Hg for at least 10 cumulative minutes was the primary outcome of interest. The associations between hypotension and age, sex, race, anesthesia time, OPOs, and OPO case volume were examined using multivariable mixed-effects Poisson regression analyses with robust standard error estimates. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to describe the variation between-MPOG centers and the OPO regions in the use of medications, time of the operation, and duration of the operation. RESULTS: We examined 1338 brain-dead adult donors, with a mean age of 42± (standard deviation [SD] 15) years; 60% (n = 801) were males and 67% (n = 891) non-Hispanic White. During the entire intraoperative monitoring period, 321 donors (24%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 22%–26%) had hypotension for a median of 13.8% [quartile1–quartile 3: 9.4%–21%] of the monitoring period and a minimum of 10 minutes to a maximum of 96 minutes [(median: 17, quartile1–quartile 3: 12–24]). The probability having hypotension in donors 35 to 64 years and 65 years and older were approximately 30% less than in donors 18 to 34 years of age (adjusted relative risk ratios, aRR, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.55–0.82, aRR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42–0.94, respectively). Donors received intravenous heparin (96.4%, n = 1291), neuromuscular blockers (89.5%, n = 1198), vasoactive medications (82.7%, n = 1108), crystalloids (76.2%, n = 1020), halogenated anesthetic gases (63.5%, n = 850), diuretics (43.8%, n = 587), steroids (16.7%, n = 224), and opioids (23.2%, n = 310). The largest practice heterogeneity observed between the MPOG center and OPO regions was steroids (between-center ICCs = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62–0.75, between-region ICCs = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.27–0.63) and diuretics (between-center ICCs = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.36–0.6, between-region ICCs = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.22–0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Despite guidelines recommending maintenance of MAP >60 mm Hg in adult brain-dead organ donors, hypotension during recovery procedures was common. Future research is needed to clarify the relationship between intraoperative events with donation and transplantation outcomes and to identify best practices for the anesthetic management of brain-dead donors in the operating room.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3