The Effect of Prophylactic Steroids on Shivering in Adults Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Misra Satyajeet1,Singh Sweta2,Sarkar Soumya1,Behera Bikram Kishore1,Jena Sritam Swarup1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care

2. Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shivering is common following anesthesia and surgery. Corticosteroids (steroids) have been tried to reduce the risk of shivering, but the evidence in favor of their use is uncertain. The primary objective of this review was to evaluate the effect of steroids on the risk of perioperative (intra- and postoperative) shivering versus controls (placebo and active controls). Additional objectives were to assess the risk of severity of shivering, patient satisfaction with shivering prophylaxis, quality of recovery (QoR), and the risk of steroid-related adverse effects. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Registry of Trials, Google Scholar, and preprint servers were searched from inception until November 30, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English language were retrieved, provided they reported on shivering either as a primary or secondary outcome following steroid prophylaxis in adult patients undergoing surgery under spinal or general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 3148 patients from 25 RCTs were included in the final analysis. The steroids used in the studies were either dexamethasone or hydrocortisone. Dexamethasone was administered intravenously or intrathecally, while hydrocortisone was administered intravenously. Prophylactic administration of steroids reduced the risk of overall shivering (risk ratio [RR], 0.65 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.52–0.82]; P = .0002; I 2 = 77%) as well as the risk of moderate to severe shivering (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34–0.71]; P = .0002; I 2 = 61%) in comparison to controls. Administration of intravenous dexamethasone (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.52–0.87]; P = .002; I 2 = 78%) and hydrocortisone (RR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32–0.80]; P = .003; I 2 = 58%) were effective in shivering prophylaxis. For intrathecal dexamethasone (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.34–2.08]; P = .7; I 2 = 56%), the null hypothesis of no subgroup difference was not rejected (P = .47), preventing definitive conclusions about the efficacy of this route of administration. The prediction intervals for both overall shivering risk (0.24–1.70) and risk of severity of shivering (0.23–1.0) precluded generalization of results in future studies. Meta-regression analysis was used to further explore heterogeneity. Factors like the dose and timing of administration of steroids or the type of anesthesia were not found to be significant. Patient satisfaction and QoR were higher in the dexamethasone groups versus placebo. No increased risk of adverse events of steroids was noted versus placebo or controls. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic steroid administration may be beneficial in reducing the risk of perioperative shivering. However, the quality of evidence in favor of steroids is very low. Further well-designed studies are needed for establishing generalization.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference70 articles.

1. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists.;Macario;Anesth Analg,1999

2. Dexmedetomidine and postoperative shivering in patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy.;Elvan;Eur J Anaesthesiol,2008

3. Efficacy of prophylactic ketamine in preventing postoperative shivering.;Dal;Br J Anaesth,2005

4. Comparison of prophylactic use of midazolam, ketamine, and ketamine plus midazolam for prevention of shivering during regional anaesthesia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.;Honarmand;Br J Anaesth,2008

5. Shivering and neuraxial anesthesia.;Crowley;Reg Anesth Pain Med,2008

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. UpToDate®;ASA Monitor;2024-01-01

2. Year 2023 in review - Pain management;Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína;2023-12-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3