Association of Opioid Administration During General Anesthesia and Survival for Severely Injured Trauma Patients: A Preplanned Secondary Analysis of the PROPPR Study

Author:

Levy Dominique T.1,Livingston Colleen E.1,Saroukhani Sepideh23,Fox Erin E.4,Wade Charles E.4,Holcomb John B.5,Gumbert Sam D.6,Galvagno Samuel M.7,Kaslow Olga Y.8,Pittet Jean-Francois9,Pivalizza Evan G.10

Affiliation:

1. McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical and Translational Sciences, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas

3. Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design (BERD) Component, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS) at UTHealth, Houston, Texas

4. Department of Surgery, Center for Translational Injury Research, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas

5. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

6. Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

7. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

8. Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

9. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

10. Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of reported clinical outcomes after opioid use in acute trauma patients undergoing anesthesia. Data from the Pragmatic, Randomized, Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) study were analyzed to examine opioid dose and mortality. We hypothesized that higher dose opioids during anesthesia were associated with lower mortality in severely injured patients. METHODS: PROPPR examined blood component ratios in 680 bleeding trauma patients at 12 level 1 trauma centers in North America. Subjects undergoing anesthesia for an emergency procedure were identified, and opioid dose was calculated (morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs])/h. After separation of those who received no opioid (group 1), remaining subjects were divided into 4 groups of equal size with low to high opioid dose ranges. A generalized linear mixed model was used to assess impact of opioid dose on mortality (primary outcome, at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 30 days) and secondary morbidity outcomes, controlling for injury type, severity, and shock index as fixed effect factors and site as a random effect factor. RESULTS: Of 680 subjects, 579 had an emergent procedure requiring anesthesia, and 526 had complete anesthesia data. Patients who received any opioid had lower mortality at 6 hours (odds ratios [ORs], 0.02–0.04; [confidence intervals {CIs}, 0.003–0.1]), 24 hours (ORs, 0.01–0.03; [CIs, 0.003–0.09]), and 30 days (ORs, 0.04–0.08; [CIs, 0.01–0.18]) compared to those who received none (all P < .001) after adjusting for fixed effect factors. The lower mortality at 30 days in any opioid dose group persisted after analysis of those patients who survived >24 hours (P < .001). Adjusted analyses demonstrated an association with higher ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence in the lowest opioid dose group compared to no opioid (P = .02), and lung complications were lower in the third opioid dose group compared to no opioid in those surviving 24 hours (P = .03). There were no other consistent associations of opioid dose with other morbidity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that opioid administration during general anesthesia for severely injured patients is associated with improved survival, although the no-opioid group was more severely injured and hemodynamically unstable. Since this was a preplanned post hoc analysis and opioid dose not randomized, prospective studies are required. These findings from a large, multi-institutional study may be relevant to clinical practice.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Year 2023 in review - Pain management;Anesteziologie a intenzivní medicína;2023-12-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3