Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients Discharged From a Community Hospital Emergency Department

Author:

Bauman Emily1,Russell Justine1,Morelli Angela1

Affiliation:

1. Saint Vincent Hospital

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Every year, thousands of emergency department (ED) visits result in patients being discharged with oral antibiotic prescriptions. Published studies that assess the appropriateness of these antibiotic regimens are limited. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions written for patients discharged from a community hospital’s ED. ENDPOINTS: The primary objective was to determine the overall percent of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions for patients discharged from the ED. Secondary objectives included the following: identify reasons for inappropriateness categorized by antibiotic selection, dose, duration, and allergies; identify the most common antibiotics prescribed inappropriately as well as the most common disease states that led to inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics; and analyze prescribing trends based on provider type and time of day the prescription was written. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients eligible for inclusion were adults age 18 and older who presented to the ED during four chosen weeks in 2019 and who were discharged with oral antibiotics. Extracted electronic health record data was reviewed to identify the discharge diagnosis for each patient that meets the inclusion criteria. Pertinent information gathered from the patients’ medical records along with a validated antimicrobial assessment tool were utilized to determine the level of appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic regimens. RESULTS: A total of 76% of the prescribed antibiotics were appropriate, 16% were inappropriate, and the remaining 8% were not assessable. Duration was the most common reason for a regimen to not be optimal. The most frequently inappropriately prescribed antibiotics included cephalexin (but it is noted cephalexin was included in almost half of the antibiotic regimens in this study), clindamycin, and azithromycin. Infections that were most frequently treated inappropriately were skin and soft tissue infections, dental infections, and sinusitis. Overall, medical residents prescribed the highest percent of appropriate regimens, and the time of day that had the highest percent of appropriate prescriptions was third shift (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Almost half of all the nonoptimal antibiotic regimens had an excessive duration. Targeted local education efforts and future clinical decision support can facilitate appropriate prescribing of discharge antibiotics from the ED, ultimately improving antimicrobial stewardship within the community.

Publisher

Patient Safety Authority

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Be Antibiotics Aware: Smart Use, Best Care. CDC website. https://www.cdc.gov/patientsafety/features/be-antibiotics-aware.html. Published 2020. Accessed November 12, 2020.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions — United States, 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/community/programs-measurement/state-local-activities/outpatient-antibiotic-prescriptions-US-2018.html. CDC website. Published 2018. Accessed November 12, 2020.

3. Siegel D, Sande MA. Patterns of Antibiotic Use in a Busy Metropolitan Emergency Room: Analysis of Efficacy and Cost-Appropriateness. West J Med. 1983;138(5):737–741. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1010818/pdf/westjmed00201-0113.pdf.

4. Denny KJ, Gartside JG, Alcorn K, Cross JW, Maloney S, Keijzers G. Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in the Emergency Department. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;74(2): 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky447.

5. Chua KP, Fischer MA, Linder JA. Appropriateness of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Among Privately Insured US Patients: ICD-10-CM Based Cross Sectional Study. BMJ. 2019;364:k5092. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5092.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3