Affiliation:
1. Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Abstract
The article examines some key issues of academic debates within the framework of the doctrine of just war – the source of international humanitarian and military law. Attention is paid to the main directions of political-philosophical military-ethical thought: traditionalist and revisionist. The conclusion is given about the low applied potential of the revision approach and the dubious prospects of its impact on international relations.
Publisher
Geoeconomics of Energetics, Institute of Diaspora and Integration
Reference28 articles.
1. Ivanov A.V. Moral’nye dilemmy i konceptual’nye protivorechiya teorii «spravedlivoj vojny» // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki: V 2 ch. 2016. № 7. CH. 2. S. 55–58.
2. Sise H. Spravedlivaya vojna? O voennoj moshchi, etike i idealah. M.: Ves’ Mir, 2007. – 175 s.
3. Uolcer M. Triumf teorii spravedlivoj vojny (i opasnosti uspekha) // Filosofsko-literaturnyj zhurnal «Logos». 2019. № 3. S. 117–138.
4. Foushin N., Koppiters B., Apresyan R. Vvedenie // Nravstvennye ogranicheniya vojny: problemy i primery. M.: Gardariki, 2002. – 407 s.
5. SHaveko N.A. Jus post bellum kak razdel teorii spravedlivoj vojny // Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya. Sociologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2022. T. 6. Vyp. 3. S. 359–368.