Traffic Circulation Efficiency of Elliptical Roundabouts

Author:

Fathullah Hardi S.ORCID,Majid Hirsh M.ORCID,Ahmed Chro H.ORCID,Sourkan Sulleyman H.ORCID,Ismael Karzan S.ORCID,Abdulsamad Balen Z.ORCID

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of geometry of central island of roundabout on operational performance in terms of delay and capacity measures. A roundabout with an elliptical central island having major and minor axes of 63 and 44m respectively was selected as a case study. Using SIDRA Intersection software two simulation models are developed while considering two geometric shapes of central island; one with an elliptical shape and the other with a circular shape. The peak traffic volume of each approach was assigned to both models as a preliminary simulation then twelve scenarios were generated by assigning identical lane volumes starting from a value that gave level of service A and increasing gradually to level of service F. In each scenario 100% of the volume assigned to an approach while the other was assigned with 75% of it and this process was reversed for every run. The results revealed that at high degree of saturation, the elliptical roundabout generally possessed a higher performance especially in term of delay and capacity compared to the circular roundabout. Furthermore, a parametric study was carried out through running eight more simulation scenarios to examine the impacts of heavy vehicle percentage (HV%) on the roundabout operational performance. The (HV %) started from 2% and increased to 12% with alternate approach virtual volume, and  the results showed that performance of the elliptical roundabout was higher than the circular roundabout. However it was more susceptible to increase of HV% in term of control delay and capacity.

Publisher

Koya University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. AASHTO., 2011. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.

2. Akçelik, R., 2011. An Assessment of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Roundabout Capacity Model. In: International Roundabout Conference. Transportation Research Board, Carmel, Indiana, USA.

3. Akçelik, R., 2011. Some Common and Differing Aspects of Alternative Models for Roundabout Capacity and Performance Estimation. In: International Roundabout Conference. Carmel, Indiana, USA: Transportation Research Board.

4. Akçelik, R., 2017. An Assessment of the Highway Capacity Manual Edition 6 Roundabout Capacity Model. In: 5th International Roundabout Conference. Transportation Research Board, Green Bay, WI, USA.

5. Akçelik, R., 2018. SIDRA Intersection 8.0 User Guide. Akçelik and Associates Pty Ltd., Greythorn, Australia. Akgelik, R., and Besley, M., 2005. Differences between the AUSTROADS roundabout guide and AUSIDRA roundabout analysis methods. Road and transport Research Journal, 14(1), pp.44-64.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3