Affiliation:
1. M. I. Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the evaluation of the centre and periphery effects in the socio-economic development of the region.
Goal. The purpose is to assess the core and peripheral effects of the impact on socio-economic development of the region.
Method (methodology). Methods of logical generalization, analysis, comparison and synthesis, integrated assessment, spatial autocorrelation are used to assess of the levels of core-periphery relations in the region.
Results. The core-periphery relations are a multilevel hierarchy with a representation of economic, social and spatial aspects. The core-periphery relation in the region is an evidence of a complex system of subordination where the core area causes most of the effects and directs the development. At the same time, different core areas of development may arise and influence on the periphery territory by absorbing its resources in the process of development of core-periphery relations. A methodical approach for evaluation of the core-periphery relations has been suggested. The methodical approach comprises: the identification of core-periphery relation in the region under the influence of the centre: the distinction of economic “growth points” and areas of their impact on the region (inner periphery and outer periphery); the assessment of the intensity of the centre or “growth points” impacts on the region. The analysis revealed a core and “growth points”, identified periphery areas in Lviv region, measured the influence of the cities of regional significance. The core-periphery relations in the region can be identified as multilevel hierarchy with economic, social and spatial aspects. Analyzing the core-periphery relations from this point of view we have distinguished features and types of such relations between territorial communities (core, “growth point”, and periphery). We have identified some areas with low levels of integration into the regional economic space and low level of social development. For such territorial communities, a differentiated approach should be implemented in order to boost economic growth along with the level of social development. Moreover, we have determined the spread of positive effects from the cities of regional significance to the socio-economic development of the region, as well as identified areas beyond their influence.
Publisher
West Ukrainian National University
Reference9 articles.
1. Rhodes, M. J., Epstein, R., & Börzel, T. A. (2019). Introduction: peripheries in competition? Political and economic development in the EU. West European Politics, 42 (5), 927-940.
2. Börzel, T. A., & Langbein, J. (2019). Core–periphery disparities in Europe: is there a link between political and economic divergence? West European Politics, 42 (5), 941-964.
3. Uwazie, I. U., Igwemma, A. A., & Ukah, F. I. (2015). Contributions of Andre Gunder Frank to the Theory of Development and Underdevelopment: Implications on Nigeria’s Development Situation. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6 (18), 27-38. Retrieved from: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEDS/article/viewFile/25824/26671.
4. Storonyanska, I., & Benovska, L. (2017). Risks of administrative and financial decentralisation: theoretical hypotheses and empirical assessment. The Economic Annals-XXI Journal, 166(7-8), 76-79.
5. Pociūtė-Sereikienė, G. (2019) Peripheral regions in Lithuania: the results of uneven development, Regional Studies, Regional Science, 6:1, 70-77, DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2019.1571437.