Abstract
DevOps has been established as a framework used by software development companies seeking to set mechanisms to automate their development processes. Consequently, over the last decade, many companies have adopted DevOps to support their project’s development process and perform continuous improvement tasks to ensure that it is applied correctly. To achieve this, companies are looking for solutions that allow them to evaluate the degree of implementation of DevOps in their internal processes. In this sense, the objective of this study focuses on identifying, through a systematic mapping of the literature, the mechanisms used to assess DevOps in software development companies. According to the above, the current state of knowledge related to the proposal of processes, models, techniques, tools, and methodological guides is presented to conduct the DevOps assessment. As a result, it is noted that there are multiple methodological solutions that seek to assess DevOps; however, a high degree of heterogeneity was evidenced in the identified solutions, resulting in the need to establish a clear framework that serves as the basis for proposing a generic, structured, and unambiguous DevOps assessment model applicable to software companies.
Publisher
Universidad Pedagogica y Tecnologica de Colombia
Subject
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Reference74 articles.
1. H. Conradi, A. Fuggetta, “Improving software process improvement,” IEEE Software, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 92–99, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2002.1020295
2. CMMI Institute, Capability maturity model integration for development, 2018.
3. Rational Software, “Rational Unified Process,” in Best Practices in Software Development Teams, 2020
4. W. W. Royce, “Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques,” in Proceedings 9th International Conference in Software Engineering, 1987, pp. 328–338
5. K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, The scrum guide the definitive guide to scrum: The rules of the game, 2017
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献