Theoretical and methodological foundations of comparative analysis of healthcare systems in the world

Author:

Travnikova Darya Aleksandrovna1

Affiliation:

1. Ural State University of Economics

Abstract

The article examines and examines the research of foreign specialists in the field of economics and healthcare organization, who used a comparative approach to analysis in their works. The article examines the features of the application of mechanisms and models of health management characteristic of different countries, studied the experience of the UK, USA, Sweden, Finland, Germany and Japan. The article systematizes the views of scientists on the problem of applying comparative research in the field of healthcare. The article defines generalizations that characterize almost all existing healthcare systems in the world today. Studies are shown that allow us to identify common principles of the organization of health systems in the world, but, at the same time, to identify specific regional and national conditions that become the basis of existing regional, subnational and national health systems. In Russia, at the same time, the healthcare system includes an insurance component and private medicine. The development of the modern healthcare system in Russia can be assessed as not very positive, since with a general reduction in the number of medical personnel and the number of medical institutions in the 90s, this trend is currently continuing, albeit in a more smoothed form. A common place in the development of the healthcare system remains the growth of paid medical services and the orientation of sectoral public authorities in the direction of the development of the health care market with the strengthening of the role of the private sector. The healthcare system is undergoing, on the one hand, an upswing due to the growth of investments caused by coronavirus infection (buildings and entire complexes are being built and repurposed to combat it), and, on the other hand, especially for "traditional" diseases, the trend outlined in previous years continues.

Publisher

LLC Publisher Stavrolit

Subject

General Medicine,General Chemistry

Reference16 articles.

1. Bohm K.. Schmid A.. Gotze R.. Landwehr C.. Roth-gang (2013) Five types of OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive classification. Health Policy 113:258-269

2. Camillo A.C. (2016) The US healthcare system: complex and unequal. Global Social Welfare 3:151-160. doi:10.1007/s40609-016-0075-z

3. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2016) National health expenditure trends. Retrieved from: https:// www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/nhex-trendsnarrative-report_2016_en.pdf

4. Government of the United Kingdom (November 30. 2015) NHS Choices: what we do. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/aboutNHSChoices/aboutnhs choices/Pages/ what-we-do.aspx

5. Grogan C.M. (2017) Diffusion of ACA policies across the American states. J Health Polit Policy Law. 42:205-209. doi:10.1215/03616878-3766691

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3