Affiliation:
1. BALCO Hospital
2. United Institute of Medical Sciences
3. Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital and Research Center
Abstract
Myopia is rising as a silent epidemic across the globe with marked ocular morbidity and pathological changes. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning is indicative of glaucomatous damage; it remains uncertain whether RNFL thickness would vary with the refractive status of the eye. It is therefore important to investigate whether any correlation exists between RNFL measurements and axial length/refractive error in myopia. Purpose. To assess the peripapillary RNFL thickness by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and to determine the correlation between axial length and peripapillary RNFL thickness in myopia patients. Material and methods. A total of 100 patients (200 eyes) with low, moderate and high myopia (ave -3.58 ± 2.45 D) aged 15 to 40 years were examined to assess the peripapillary RNFL thickness by SD-OCT and to determine the correlation between axial length (AL) and peripapillary RNFL thickness myopia patients. Results. Average 360-degree RNFL thickness (mean ± SD) was 92.25 ± 10.04 μm. In the low myopic group this parameter was 98.82 ± 6.67 μm, in the moderate myopic group — 89.28±5.23 μm, and in the high myopic group — 78.54 ± 7.32 μm. The average 360-degree mean RNFL thickness in patients with AL < 24 mm was 100.06 ± 5.92 μm, in patients with AL between 24–26 mm — 89.48 ± 4.59 μm, and in patients with AL > 26 mm — 78.2 ± 6.77 μm. There was significant association between thinning of the average 360-degree RNFL thickness with increasing degree of myopia and AL (p < 0.0001). Conclusion. The study shows RNFL thickness decreases with increase in refractive error and increase in axial length of myopic eyes. The degree of myopia may affect the RNFL thickness differently.
Reference29 articles.
1. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Aug; 41 (9): 2486–94. PMID: 10937558
2. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016 May; 123 (5): 1036–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
3. Khan SA. A retrospective study of low-vision cases in an Indian tertiary eye-care hospital. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep; 48 (3): 201–7. PMID: 11217251
4. Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, et al. Population-based assessment of refractive error in India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2002; 30 (2): 84–93. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-6404.2002.00492.x
5. Krishnaiah S, Srinivas M, Khanna RC, Rao GN. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in the South Indian adult population: the Andhra Pradesh Eye disease study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2009; 3: 17–27. PMID: 19668540