A narrative journey into the borderland of patient safety: Toward an expanded, relational concept of safety

Author:

Lauge Andersen LisbethORCID

Abstract

“Patient safety” is routinely defined in health services globally as “safety for patients against harm and risk of injury in health care.” (Danish Board of Quality in Health Care, 2022, p. 28; translated by the author). This is a standardized, broad, and general definition of what counts as safety. In this article, I argue for an expanded, relational concept of patient safety revolving around experienced patient safety. Recognizing safety as vital for all groups of patients, I follow a dialogical, critical-reflexive approach to focus on safety in a somatic hospital setting in Denmark as it is experienced by people with lived experience of mental distress. Safety in this context is often compromised, contributing to inequity in health for people with mental distress. I present and analyze the narratives of two experts by experience about their somatic hospital stay. As an analytical approach, I draw on Frank’s dialogical narrative analysis together with elements from Bakhtin’s theory of dialogue and Foucault’s theory of power/knowledge. Forefronting voices of those rarely asked and seldom heard, dialogical narrative analysis provides insight into how “patient safety” is enacted through situated negotiations of meaning in the narratives of people with lived experience. The storytellers are continuously struggling to fit in and to be seen as human beings, trying to resist public narratives on mental distress that threaten to limit their scope of action and who they can become. The discussion highlights how unintended emotional and psychosocial harm limit the benefits of patient safety for certain groups in society. In particular, shame, individualized responsibility, and internalized inferiority hinder equity in health. Building on my analysis, I suggest a collaborative, participatory approach for coproducing further knowledge through joint analysis with people with lived experience and nurses from somatic hospital wards.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Building and Construction

Reference43 articles.

1. Bach, K. F. (2020, August 19). Happy pride week! Let’s have equity in health for LGBT+ [Glædelig pride uge! Lad os så få lighed i sundhed for LGBT+]. Danish Society for Patient Safety. https://patientsikkerhed.dk/glaedelig-pride-uge-lad-os-saa-faa-lighed-i-sundhed-for-lgbt/

2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four Essays. University of Texas Press.

3. Bakhtin, M. & Emerson, C. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. University of Minnesota Press.

4. Belin, S. (1999). The power of madness [Galskabens magt]. Hans Reitzel.

5. Berring, L. L., Pedersen, L., & Buus, N. (2015). Discourses of aggression in forensic mental health: A critical discourse analysis of mental health nursing staff records. Nursing Inquiry, 22(4), 296–305.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3