Using multiple primary endpoints in clinical trials with a focus on heart failure

Author:

Anker Stefan D.,Butler Javed,Talha Khawaja M.,Friede Tim

Abstract

The use of multiple primary endpoints in cardiovascular clinical trials could be useful addition to the arsenal of comprehensive evaluations of meaningful clinical outcomes. Particularly, it may be advantageous and more economic to use several primary endpoints, if several useful endpoint alternatives exist and when it is uncertain what degree of benefit a certain intervention to be tested can achieve, i.e. what power a trial has for a given endpoint. However, analysis of multiple endpoints gives rise to issues of multiplicity of outcomes and family-wise error rate. There are statistical adjustment models (single and multistep) that modify the level of significance for each endpoint based on the number of endpoints considered overall to control the family-wise error rate. The Bonferroni method is a single step approach that divides the nominal significance level alpha equally across all endpoints but is considered a conservative approach in cases where the number of endpoints is large and where endpoints are correlated. The most used multistep approaches include the Holm and Hochberg procedures. The Hochberg method is a more efficient, and less conservative approach towards alpha adjustment compared to the Holm procedure. The Bonferroni, Holm and Hochberg test procedures are all considered suitable analysis strategies for multiple primary endpoints with no need to determine a priori the order for the testing to be performed as is needed in all hierarchical test procedures that are most commonly used today. Furthermore, these strategies can also be used to protect the error rate when including secondary endpoints in an extended analytical procedure. The use of any of these methods needs to be specified a priori in the statistical analysis plan to ensure adequate statistical validity. Examples of clinical trials in the heart failure field that have used or are using such multiple primary endpoint approaches are: MIRACLE, ASCEND-HF, EVEREST, FAIR-HF, DELIVER, RESHAPE-HF2 and FAIR-HF2.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3