Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends
-
Published:2023-10-11
Issue:2
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2385-0922
-
Container-title:Natural History Sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Nat Hist Sci
Author:
Massaad MarkORCID, Da Silveira Bueno RafaelORCID, Bentaleb Ilham, La Mantia TommasoORCID
Abstract
Insular bat communities are a preeminent conservation taxon due to their ecological role and intriguing and unique species composition. Sicily is the largest island in the Mediterranean. However, research on Sicilian bats is still scattered, with substantial information being overlooked. Here we present a systematic review of all available bibliographic information from 1810 to 2022, including grey literature, archives, and peer-reviewed publications. The analyses of bibliographic sources permitted us to evaluate the status of research on bats using the Bat Research Efficiency (BRE) and Species-Research Effort Allocation (SREA) metrics. A total of 81 documents were obtained. Since 1955, an average of 1.2 contributions have been issued per year. Over half of the documents are in Italian. The studies are primarily conducted in north-western (40%) and south-eastern (28%) Sicily, mainly in the provinces of Palermo and Siracusa. Most of the contributions concern “Species records” (61%) and “Ecology” (21%). There were 28 species reported, but a significant bias exists towards Myotis myotis, Miniopterus schreibersii, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Myotis capaccinii, and Rhinolophus euryale. Around 31.5% of the studies focused on threatened species, while 68.5% concentrated on non-threatened species, with an overall preference for cave-dwelling species. Yet, SREA analysis demonstrates a lack of research efforts for all species. We encourage the use of a multidisciplinary approach towards under-studied species while covering geographical gaps and increasing public awareness of the functional role of bats in natural ecosystems.
Publisher
PAGEPress Publications
Subject
Paleontology,Geology,Plant Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference101 articles.
1. Agnelli P., Martinoli A., Patriarca E., Russo D., Scaravelli D. & Genovesi P., 2004 – Linee guida per il monitoraggio dei Chirotteri: Indicazioni metodologiche per lo studio e la conservazione dei pipistrelli in Italia. Quaderni di Conservazione della Natura. Ministero dell’Ambiente, Istituto Nazionale Fauna Selvatica, Roma, 19. 2. Agnelli P., Di Salvo I., Russo D. & Sarà M., 2008 – Chirotterofauna della Sicilia (Mammalia Chiroptera). In: Atlante della Biodiversità della Sicilia: Vertebrati terrestri. Studi e Ricerche, 6. AA.VV. (eds.). Arpa Sicilia, Palermo: 25-41. 3. Ancillotto L., Santini L., Ranc N., Maiorano L. & Russo D., 2016 – Extraordinary range expansion in a common bat: the potential roles of climate change and urbanization. The Science of Nature, 103 (3): 1-8. 4. Ancillotto L., Bosso L., Smeraldo S., Mori E., Mazza G., Herkt M., Galimberti A., Ramazzotti F. & Russo D., 2020 – An African bat in Europe, Plecotus gaisleri: Biogeographic and ecological insights from molecular taxonomy and Species Distribution Models. Ecology and evolution, 10 (12): 5785-5800. 5. Audra P., De Waele J., Bentaleb I., Chroňáková A., Krištůfek V. & D’Angeli I. M., Carbone C., Madonia G., Vattano M., Scopelliti G., Cailhol D., Vanara N., Temovski M., Bigot J.-Y., Nobécourt J.-C., Galli E., Rull F., & Sanz-Arraz A., 2019 – Guano-related phosphate-rich minerals in European caves. International Journal of Speleology, Tampa, FL (USA), 48 (1): 75-105.
|
|