Economic contestation over user fees in low-resourced healthcare systems: A literature review

Author:

Pagiwa Vincent

Abstract

This paper reviewed the literature on economic theory and assumptions that provide the rationale for using a price system to finance health care services in developing countries. The primary case in favor of a system of user fees for financing healthcare in these countries lies in allocative efficiency results to be achieved through a price system. The assumption being that, the price system signals to consumers what they must pay for health care services hence giving them an incentive to utilize those services well. However, this assumes perfect markets, where prices reflect the true marginal benefits of consuming healthcare goods and the marginal cost of their production. All equity concerns being addressed through price discrimination, a system of user fees can then allocate health care resources efficiently. Although the application of user fees in the health sector is justified by the perfect markets, there are concerns that a perfect market is less likely to be the case in health sector. Therefore, it will not be a viable way to rely on the price system to allocate resources to the population when markets of any healthcare goods and services are not available or are imperfect. Information asymmetry and uncertainty are the major obstacles to a proper function of a price system in healthcare service provision. Due to the inelastic nature of the demand for healthcare, charging fees for healthcare services can pose hard financial catastrophes to poor and lead into poverty. This suggests the need to establish healthfinancing policies that would facilitate the creation of new markets or which can improve the performance of existing ones in developing countries.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3