Author:
Tangianu Flavio,Mazzone Antonino,Berti Franco,Pinna Giuliano,Bortolotti Irene,Colombo Fabrizio,Nozzoli Carlo,La Regina Micaela,Greco Antonio,Filannino Cristina,Silingardi Mauro,Nardi Roberto
Abstract
There are many feasible tools for the assessment of clinical practice, but there is a wide consensus on the fact that the simultaneous use of several different methods could be strategic for a comprehensive overall judgment of clinical competence. Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a well-established reliable method of assessing knowledge. Constructing effective MCQ tests and items requires scrupulous care in the design, review and validation stages. Creating high-quality multiple-choice questions requires a very deep experience, knowledge and large amount of time. Hereby, after reviewing their construction, strengths and limitations, we debate their completeness for the assessment of professional competence.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献