Shaping geriatric practice: evaluating Beers, PRISCUS, and European Union(7) criteria for optimal patient care. A retrospective study

Author:

Sood ShikhaORCID,Saija NidhiORCID,Rana Devang,Shah KanishaORCID,Santoki Hirva,Prajapati Vipul

Abstract

Medications whose risk of adverse drug events exceeds their expected clinical benefit when given to older patients are called potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The geriatric population represents about 10% of the world population and 7% of the Indian population and consumes 40% of prescription and 35% of all over-the-counter drugs. That is why it is necessary to evaluate the use of PIMs in the geriatric population. This study aimed to evaluate prescriptions for PIMs by using three pre-validated and internationally used criteria, namely the Beers criteria (2019), the European Union (EU)(7) list (2015), and the PRISCUS list (2010). A retrospective observational study began after obtaining written approval from the institutional review board. Demographic and clinical profiles and patients' complete prescriptions were recorded, and the Beers criteria (2019), the EU(7) (2015) list, and the PRISCUS list (2010) were applied. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 345 patients, with a mean age of 71.48 years, were included in the study. Vitamin D3 (56.81%) was frequently prescribed as medicine. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, PIMs were 311 (11.26%), 272 (9.85%), and 105 (3.80%), respectively. Pantoprazole [20.57% Beers and 23.52% EU(7)] and glimepiride [15.43% Beers and 17.64% EU(7)] were the most inappropriate drugs. According to the PRISCUS list, piroxicam (21.9%) and etoricoxib (19.04%) were the inappropriate drugs. According to the Beers, EU(7), and PRISCUS criteria, total inappropriate prescriptions containing at least one PIM are 183 (52.04%), 174 (50.43%), and 88 (25.5%), respectively. The number of prescriptions with inappropriate medication is highly correlated with the total number of drugs prescribed per prescription (p<0.01) and the total number of fixed-dose combinations (p<0.01). Maximum PIMs were found with the Beers criteria and minimum PIMs with the PRISCUS list. This study shows that the prescription of PIMs ranges from 25.5 to 52.04%. The EU(7) list had the highest sensitivity (63.66%), while the PRISCUS list had the highest specificity (98.48%) to detect PIMs with the Beers criteria taken as a reference.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3