Intermittent attendance at breast cancer screening

Author:

Fleming Padraic,O'Neill Sinead,Owens Miriam,Mooney Therese,Fitzpatrick Patricia

Abstract

<em>Background</em>. To determine why women skip rounds and factors influencing return of previous non attenders (PNAs) to breast screening. <em></em><br /><em>Design and methods</em>. Retrospective, quantitative, structured questionnaire posted to 2500 women. First PNAs did not attend their first screening appointment in 2007/2008 but then attended in 2010; First Controls first attended in 2010 without missed previous appointments. Women who attended screening in 2006 or earlier then skipped a round but returned in 2010 were Subsequent PNAs; Subsequent Controls attended all appointments.<br /><em>Results</em>. More First Controls than First PNAs had family history of cancer (72.7% <em>vs</em> 63.2%; P=0.003); breast cancer (31.3% <em>vs</em> 24.8%; P=0.04). More PNAs lived rurally; more First PNAs had 3rd level education (33.2% <em>vs</em> 23.6%; P=0.002) and fewer had private insurance than First Controls (57.7% <em>vs</em> 64.8%; P=0.04). Excellent/good health was reported in First PNAs and First Controls (82.9% <em>vs</em> 83.2%), but fewer Subsequent PNAs than Subsequent Controls (72.7% <em>vs</em> 84.9%; P=0.000). Common considerations at time of missed appointment were<em> had mammogram elsewhere</em> (33% First PNA) and <em>postponed to next round</em> (16% First PNA, 18.8% Subsequent PNA). Considerations when returning to screening were similar for First PNAs and Subsequent PNAs: <em>I am older </em>(35.4%, 29.6%), <em>I made sure I remembered</em> (29%, 23.6%), <em>could reschedule</em> (17.6%, 20.6%), <em>illness of more concern</em> (16.5%, 19%). More First PNAs stated <em>my family/friends advised</em> (22.3% <em>vs</em> 15.2%) or<em> my GP</em> (12.6% <em>vs</em> 4.6%) <em>advised me to attend</em>, h<em>eard good things about BreastCheck</em> (28.8% <em>vs</em> 13.6%).<br /><em>Conclusions</em>. Intermittent attenders do not fit socio-demographic patterns of non-attenders; GP recommendation and word of mouth were important in women’s return to screening. Fear and anxiety seem to act as a screening facilitator rather than an inhibitor.<br />

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3