Abstract
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), COVID‑19 has caused more than 6.5 million deaths, while over 600 million people are infected. With regard to the tools and techniques of disease analysis, spatial analysis is increasingly being used to analyze the impact of COVID‑19. The present review offers an assessment of research that used regional data systems to study the COVID‑19 epidemic published between 2020 and 2022. The research focuses on: categories of the area, authors, methods, and procedures used by the authors and the results of their findings. This input will enable the contrast of different spatial models used for regional data systems with COVID‑19. Our outcomes showed increased use of geographically weighted regression and Moran I spatial statistical tools applied to better spatial and time‑based gauges. We have also found an increase in the use of local models compared to other spatial statistics models/methods.
Reference71 articles.
1. Mansour, S., et al., Sociodemographic determinants of COVID-19 incidence rates in Oman: Geospatial modelling using multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR). Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021. 65: p. 102627.
2. Mollalo, A., B. Vahedi, and K. Rivera, M, GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States. Science of the Total Environment, 2020. 728: p. 138884.
3. Ni, L., et al., Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Immunity, 2020. 52(6): p. 971-977.
4. Cicalò, E. and M. Valentino, Mapping and visualisation on of health data. The contribution on of the graphic sciences to medical research from New York yellow fever to China Coronavirus. Disegnarecon, 2019. 12(23): p. 1211-1219.
5. Ebrahim, S., H, et al., Covid-19 and community mitigation strategies in a pandemic. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2020. 368: p. 2020.