Effectiveness and safety of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy

Author:

Blanco SalvatoreORCID,Grasso Angelica,Sulmina EndritORCID,Grasso MarcoORCID

Abstract

Objective: Prostate cancer is one of the most widespread neoplasms affecting the male gender. The most commonly used procedures in various urological centers are laparoscopic and robotic surgery because they are considered minimally invasive techniques. We present our experience in traditional open radical prostatectomy performed under spinal anesthesia. Materials and methods: We reviewed the clinical courses of 88 consecutive patients who underwent open radical prostatectomy performed under spinal anesthesia at our Institution. Results: Median age: 67.7 years. Median follow up duration: 48 months. Median pre-operative PSA: 15,9 ng/ml, median Prostate weight: 44.5 gr, median surgical time: 96.5 minutes (range 55-138). Perioperative complications were recorded. The most frequent complication was anemia, 9 cases need blood transfusion after surgery. Complications directly related to spinal anesthesia were not observed. Most patients were discharged within 5 days from the procedure. After two weeks we observed a quick recovery of total continence in 90% of patients. After 6 months all patients were perfectly continent. Erectile dysfunction after 6 months was reported by 48 patients. Conclusions: The reasons why the gold standard of radical prostatectomy surgery has been considered general anesthesia are essentially two: the long duration of the surgical procedure and the associated significant blood loss. Multiple evidences show that radical retropubic prostatectomy can be safely performed under spinal anaesthesia with various advantages. It is therefore no longer justified to consider general anesthesia as the gold standard for radical prostatectomy with an open technique.

Publisher

PAGEPress Publications

Subject

Urology

Reference20 articles.

1. Pereira R, Joshi A, Roberts M, et al. Open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9:3025-3035.

2. Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, et al. A comparative study of robotassisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures. M. BJU Int. 2019; 123:1031-1040.

3. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Campbell’s Urology, 7th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, Co., 1998; vol.3, chapt. 86, pp.2565-2588.

4. Grasso M, Torelli F, Lania C, Blanco S. The role of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy: clinical and urodynamic study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2012; 84:1-6.

5. Grasso M, Blanco S, Grasso AAC, et al. Radio guided radical prostatectomy: evaluation of feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016; 68:3-8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3