Abstract
In recent years, the use of the adjective “therapeutic” has expanded to encompass a great variety of experiences, blurring the line between what is effectively therapeutic and what is not. Proceeding from the idea that a word’s meaning is linked to its use in a particular linguistic game, we will analyse the etymons “therapy” and “psychotherapy” and the change in their meanings over time. This background will guide us in the qualitative analysis of the so-called “therapeutic activities” available on the websites of 14 Italian therapeutic communities for treating addiction. Four main master narratives emerge from our investigation. These are characterised by biomedical assumptions, pedagogical principles, religious precepts, and moral values, respectively. Activities are considered therapeutic per se rather than based on theoretical assumptions regarding change. In the light of our results, the adjective “therapeutic” has become a domain of common sense, which poses the threat of undue reification of the linguistic game that expresses it.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology
Reference61 articles.
1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bamberg, M., & Andrews, M. (Eds.). (2004). Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense (Vol. 4). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
3. Barclay, M. W. (1997). The metaphoric foundation of literal language: towards a theory of the reification and meaning of psychological constructs. Theory & Psychology, 7, 355–372. doi:10.1177/ 0959354397073004.
4. Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1969). La costruzione sociale della realtà. Bologna: Il Mulino.
5. Brooks, J. & King, N. (2012). Qualitative psychology in the real world: The utility of template analysis. In: 2012 British Psychological Society Annual Conference, 18th 20th April 2012, London, UK.