Abstract
This study is focused on the change in new behaviour and routines on the issues of safe water and sanitation in Indonesia. The aim of this study is to explain the deconstruction of people's consciousness and societal knowledge on wastewater treatment plant (IPAL) facilities and the resulting behavioural change. By positioning programmes of safe water, sanitation, and the local value of healthy living as the “life projects”, this article attempts to re-examine the position of local communities in this project. Life projects are programmes that adhere to the local histories of communities in perceiving ‘development’. Life projects are premised on densely and uniquely woven 'threads' of landscapes, memory, expectations, and desire. In this regard, this article tries to disclose the participation of local communities in planning, managing and integrating local values and global visions of proper sanitation development programs in their villages. This study was a micro one conducted at Sumberdawesari village, in Pasuruan, East Java. Sumberdawesari is one of the IWINS-USAID’s pilot projects of the communal IPAL programme. This research utilizes the life history approach with the data collection techniques of observation, biography, focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews. The nature of this study focuses on the desire to share information about low-level experiences of local communities regarding the availability and the sustainable management of water and sanitation toward a healthy and self-reliance settlement. This research finds the increased awareness of the population in implementing sanitation development programs at the level of habitus, individual, household, community, and social structure through the dimensions of contextual, managerial and technical knowledge.
Publisher
Department of Communication and Community Development Sciences
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Adams, E. A., & Boateng, G. O. (2018). Are urban informal communities capable of co-production? The influence of community–public partnerships on water access in Lilongwe, Malawi. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818792059
2. Bajracharya, D. (2003). Myanmar experiences in sanitation and hygiene promotion: lessons learned and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 13(sup1), S141–S152. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960312031000102903
3. Becker, S., Naumann, M., & Moss, T. (2017). Between coproduction and commons: understanding initiatives to reclaim urban energy provision in Berlin and Hamburg. Urban Research & Practice, 10(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735
4. Beresford, P. (2019). Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge. Frontiers in Sociology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00041
5. Bourchier, D. (2010). Kisah adat dalam imajinasi politik Indonesia dan kebangkitan masa kini. In J. S. Davidson, D. Henley, & S. Moniaga (Eds.), Adat dalam politik Indonesia (pp. 125–142). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献