A Systematic Review of Direct Assessments to Evaluate Psychotropic Medication Effects for Children With Disabilities
Author:
Torelli Jessica N.1, Lloyd Blair P.1, Pollack Marney S.1
Affiliation:
1. Jessica N. Torelli, Blair P. Lloyd, and Marney S. Pollack, Peabody College at Vanderbilt University
Abstract
Abstract
To evaluate effects of psychotropic medication for children with disabilities, direct assessments may offer a valuable supplement to caregiver reports. Relative to indirect assessment, direct measures of behavior can increase objectivity and sensitivity, and some have potential to isolate distinct behavioral and learning processes. We conducted a systematic, narrative literature review to identify and describe the types and qualities of direct assessment methods that have been used to evaluate effects of non-stimulant psychotropic medication for children with disabilities. We identified 50 studies and 78 direct assessments, which we organized and described using seven assessment categories. Only one study met all three direct assessment quality indicators. We use our descriptive results to highlight research trends and gaps that warrant further study.
Publisher
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference101 articles.
1. Aman,
M. G.,
Marks,
R. E.,
Turbott,
S. H.,
Wilsher,
C. P.,
&
Merry,S. N.
(1991).
Methylphenidate and thioridazine in the treatment of intellectually subaverage children: Effects on cognitive-motor performance.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
30(5),
816–
824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8567(10)80022-X 2. Aman,
M. G.,
Novotny,
S.,
Samango-Sprouse,
C.,
Lecavalier,
E.,
Gadow,
K.,
King,
B. H.,
Pearson,
D. A.,
Gernsbacher,
M. A.,
&
Chez,M.
(2004).
Outcome measures for clinical drug trials in autism.
CNS Spectrums, 9(1), 36–
47.
https://doi.org/d2fd 3. Aman,
M. G.,
Teehan,
C. J.,
White,
A. J.,
Turbott,
S. H.,
&
Vaithianathan,C.
(1989).
Haloperidol treatment with chronically medicated residents: Dose effects on clinical behavior and reinforcement contingencies.
American Journal on Mental Retardation,
93(4),
452–
460.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2649118/ 4. Aman,
M. G.,
White,
A. J.,
&
Field,C. J.
(1984).
Chlorpromazine effects on stereotypic and conditioned behaviour of severely retarded patients: A pilot study.
Journal of Mental Deficiency Research,
28(4),
253–
260.
https://doi.org/fksztv
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|