Affiliation:
1. Karrie A. Shogren, University of Kansas, Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.
Abstract
Abstract
The right to science has been identified in multiple human rights treaties; however, there has not been a clear framework for how governments or research organizations can advance this right particularly ensuring equitable engagement of people with intellectual disability (ID) in the process of scientific research. Although the feasibility and impacts of engaging people with ID in the process of science have been repeatedly demonstrated there remain systemic barriers including ableism, racism, and other systems of oppression that sustain inequities. Researchers in the ID field must take steps to dismantle systemic barriers and advance participatory approaches that advance equity in the process and outcomes of science.
Publisher
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Community and Home Care,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference33 articles.
1. Ahlers,
K. P.
,
Ayers,K. B.,
Iadarola,S.,
Hughes,R. B.,
Lee,H. S., &
Williamson,H. J.
(2021).
Adapting participatory action research to include individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Developmental Disabilities Network Journal, 1(2), Article 5.
https://doi.org/10.26077/ec55-409c
2. Annamma,
S. A.
,
Connor,D., &
Ferri,B.
(2013).
Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability.
Race Ethnicity and Education,
16(1),
1–31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
3. Annamma,
S. A.
,
Ferri,B., &
Connor,D.
(Eds.).
(2022).
DisCrit expanded: Reverberations, ruptures, and inquiries.
Teachers College Press.
4. Barnes,
C.
(2002).
‘Emancipatory disability research': project or process? Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 2(1).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471–3802.2002.00157.x
5. Beckwith,
R.-M.
,
Friedman,M. G., &
Conroy,J. W.
(2016).
Beyond tokenism: People with complex needs in leadership roles: A review of the literature.
Inclusion,
4(3),
137–155.
https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.3.137
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献