Short-Term Changes of Frailty in Prematurely Aging Adults With Intellectual Disability-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Short-Term Changes of Frailty in Prematurely Aging Adults With Intellectual Disability

Published:2022-02-01 Issue:1 Volume:60 Page:57-65
ISSN:1934-9556
Container-title:Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Lin Shu-Yuan¹,Tseng Hui-Chen¹

Affiliation:

1. Shu-Yuan Lin and Hui-Chen Tseng, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate short-term changes of frailty in adults and identify predictors of frailty and disability changes between baseline and the follow-up. A cohort study was conducted in 85 adults with intellectual disability (ID) in southern Taiwan. Variables of frailty phenotype, Barthel Index, fall, comorbidity, and hospitalization were measured at baseline and at a 9-month follow-up. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and generalized linear model technique were used for data analysis. The percentages of frailty and pre-frail conditions were high at baseline. Improvement or deterioration on frailty was noticed in 37.6% of participants. Disability and comorbidity were significant predictors to changes in frailty, and severity of ID and frailty conditions were significant predictors to changes in disability.

Publisher

American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Community and Home Care,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

https://meridian.allenpress.com/idd/article-pdf/60/1/57/3009076/i1934-9556-60-1-57.pdf

Reference25 articles.

1. Brehmer, B., & Weber,G. (2010). Frailty vs. disability distinctions in people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(1), 49– 58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00247.x

2. Brehmer-Rinderer, B., Zeilinger, E. L., Radaljevic, A., & Weber,G. (2013). The Vienna Frailty Questionnaire for Persons With Intellectual Disabilities: Revised. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(6), 1958– 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.03.004

3. Bouillon, K., Kivimaki, M., Hamer, M., Sabia, S., Fransson, E. I., Singh-Manoux, A., Gale, C. R., & Batty,G. D. (2013). Measures of frailty in population-based studies: An overview. BMC Geriatrics, 13(1), 1– 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-64

4. Bouzón, C. A., Carnicero, J. A., Turín, J. G., García-García, F. J., Esteban, A., & Rodríguez-Mañas,L. (2017). The standardization of frailty phenotype criteria improves its predictive ability: The Toledo study for healthy aging. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(5), 402– 408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.003

5. Chan, D.C. D., Tsou, H.H., Yang, R.S., Tsauo, J.Y., Chen, C.Y., Hsiung, C.A., & Kuo,K. (2012). A pilot randomized controlled trial to improve geriatric frailty. BMC Geriatrics, 12, 58.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-12-58

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Definition, assessment and management of frailty for people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review;Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities;2024-03-14