Affiliation:
1. F. M. Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Abstract
The total content (cΣ) of toxic phenols in water is usually determined using the procedures which include the introduction of a group reagent, measurement of the generalized signal (AΣ) at a selected wavelength, and assessment of cΣ in terms of C6H5OH. The use of diazotized sulfanilic acid (DSA) as a group reagent leads to the errors of cΣ determination which do not exceed 30% thus ensuring more adequate estimates of cΣ than measuring phenolic index. We suppose that further reduction of errors in group analysis would be possible with multiwavelength measurements and multivariate calibrations but these promising techniques have not been used yet for the determination of total phenol. To check up this assumption, model multicomponent colored solutions of the known composition were prepared and analyzed. These model mixtures contained simultaneously up to 5 different phenols with a total concentration ranged from 15 to 70 μmol/L. After converting all phenols to corresponding azo-dyes their generalized signals were measured at m wavelengths in the UV region of the spectrum 10 minutes after mixing the solutions. The results of group analysis were calculated with the multivariate calibrations; the recalculation of AΣ values to standard substance concentration we used only for comparison. The inverted multivariate calibrations were calculated with AΣ values of n model mixtures which formed a training set. For optimized conditions (m = 7, n = 10) the systematic error of cΣ prediction is less than 13 % rel., that is half of errors for total index calculation. Therefore, inverted multivariate calibrations can be rather useful to control the total content of phenolics in natural and waste waters (instead of the total indices). However, systematic errors raised sharply when the analyzed sample contained some individual phenols which were absent in samples of the training set; in such cases the errors can increase up to 80 % rel. To maximize the correctness of corresponding techniques, it is desirable to elucidate beforehand the qualitative composition of phenol mixtures in water samples under study and take it into account when the multivariate calibration is used.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science,Analytical Chemistry
Reference23 articles.
1. Vorob’eva T. V., Terletskaya A. V., Kushchevskaya N. F. Standard and unified methods to determine the phenols in natural and waste water and he basic ways their development / Khim. Tekhnol. Vody. 2007. Vol. 29. N 4. P. 370 – 390 [in Russian].
2. ISO 6439:1990(E). Water quality. Determination of Phenol index. 4-Aminoantipyrine spectrometric methods after distillation. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/12795/21d5440a9f474ce09fd682a4c8084387/ISO-6439-1990.pdf (accessed June 4, 2023).
3. ASTM D1783–01(2020). Standard Test Methods for Phenolic Compounds in Water. https://www.astm.org/d1783-01r20.html (accessed June 4, 2023).
4. Goerlitz D. F., Brown E. Methods for analysis of organic substances in water. — Washington: US Geological Survey, 1984. — 40 p. DOI: 10.3133/twri05A3_1972
5. Khatmullina R. M., Safarova V. I., Magasumova A. T., et al. Determination of some phenols in water by HPLC method with electrochemical detection / Bashkir. Khim. Zh. 2008. Vol. 15. N 3. P. 48 – 52 [in Russian].