ASSESSMENT OF SWEET CHERRY CULTIVARS OBTAINED AT RESEARCH STATION FOR FRUIT GROWING IASI, ROMANIA-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ASSESSMENT OF SWEET CHERRY CULTIVARS OBTAINED AT RESEARCH STATION FOR FRUIT GROWING IASI, ROMANIA

Published:2022-12-22 Issue: Volume:38 Page:45-49
ISSN:2602-1978
Container-title:Fruit Growing Research
language:
Short-container-title:FGR

Author:

Iurea Elena, ,Sîrbu Sorina,Corneanu Margareta,Golache Iuliana Elena,Mineață Iulia,Ungureanu Ionuț Vasile, , , , ,

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present valuable features of sweet cherry cultivars with different maturation ages of the fruits approved at RSFG Iasi between 2017 to 2021. Due to its fruits ripening age being earlier than other fruit-growing species (beginning with May), the cherry represents the first link in the annual chain of fruits production. Analysing the bloom phenophase, it was noticed that the cultivars Margonia and Croma bloom period was about two weeks later than the other cultivars. The maturation age of the fruits was spread over 57 days, starting on May the 21st for cultivar 'Cătălina', ending on July 16th for cultivar 'George'. Statistically, in terms of fruits weight (g) and equatorial diameter (mm), cultivars 'Alexus' (9.4 g and 26.6 mm), 'Elaiaşi' (8.8 g and 25.4 mm), 'Croma' (8.0 g and 24.2 mm), 'Maria' (7.8 g and 23.7 mm) and 'Tereza' (7.8 g and 25.4 mm) were highlighted with superior significant differences in comparison with the control cultivar 'Van' (7.4 g and 25.2 mm). In terms of the fruits content in soluble dry substance, cultivars 'Tereza' (19.2%), 'Alexus' (18.6%), 'Maria' (17.8%) and 'Cătălina' (17.8%) recorded superior significant values in comparison with the control cultivar 'Van' (17.7%). All the studied cultivars presented superior resistance to the fruits cracking phenomenon in comparison with the control cultivar 'Van' (41.8%) recording values below 16%.

Publisher

Research Institute for Fruit Growing

Subject

Horticulture,Soil Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

Reference16 articles.

1. 1. Branişte N., Budan S., Butac M., Militaru M., 2007. Soiuri de pomi, arbuşti fructiferi şi căpşuni create în România, Editura Paralela 45, Piteşti, 476 pg.

2. 2. Budan S., Grădinariu G., 2000. Cireşul, Editura Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iaşi, 262 pg.

3. 3. Cociu V., Oprea Şt., 1989. Metode de cercetare în ameliorarea plantelor pomicole, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 172 pg.

4. 4. Darbyshire R., Webb L., Goodwin I., Barlow E. W. R., 2012. Evaluation of recent trends in Australian pome fruit spring phenology, International Journal of Biometeorology, available as abstract on http://link.springer.com/article/1# (accessed 13.02.2013).

5. 5. Dumitrescu Gh., Hriţcu C., Frunză P., Bazgan C., 1981. Studiu privind cultura cireşului şi vişinului în judeţul Iaşi, Cercetări Agronimice în Moldova, vol. 3: 77-82.