Workplace innovation in Finland: Towards sustainable productivity growth?

Author:

Tuomo Alasoini,Ramstad Elise,Asko Heikkilä,Ylöstalo Pekka

Abstract

This paper examines challenges that Finnish companies are facing in the global productivity race and means they have used in responding to these challenges, with a special reference to work organization, personnel competence development and utilization of external sources in acquiring new knowledge. In recent years, Finnish companies have been actively modernising their work organization. In the ‘innovative work organization index’ developed by Valeyre et al. (2009), for example, Finland ranked third of all the EU27 countries in 2005. One special feature of Finnish companies’ modernization strategies compared with those of the other highest ranking countries – Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands – was a more widespread use of ‘lean production’ approach, whereas in the dissemination of ‘discretionary learning’ forms of work organization Finland was lagging behind these three countries. In concrete terms and in comparison with the other highest ranking countries, Finnish companies have laid more emphasis on teamwork, task rotation, multi-skilling and decentralization of quality control in their strategies to renovate work organization, while less notion than in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands has been paid to increasing individuals’ autonomy and variety in work and reducing constraints that pace work. These differences may be explained by the strong engineering orientation in Finnish management culture, the lesser influence by the socio-technical systems design approach and the fact that quality of working life entered the Finnish policy agenda later than in the three above-mentioned countries (Alasoini, 2004; Kasvio, 1994; Koistinen – Lilja, 1988). This paper examines work organization modernization strategies of Finnish companies with the help of establishment-level data and by looking at companies in industry and private services separately, with a view to finding similarities and differences in the operation logics and change strategies between these two sectors. The paper includes an analysis on decision-making structures, nature of teamwork, personnel competence development practices and utilization of external sources of knowledge in these two sectors. The empirical material is based on a survey, carried out by the Finnish Workplace Development Programme TYKES (2004–2010). The paper starts with an introduction to different approaches to workplace innovation in companies and to different policy options in tackling with the problem of low level of workplace innovation in Europe. Thereafter, the paper provides an overview on the main problems facing Finland’s future economic growth and on policies to promote workplace innovation. Thirdly, the article presents the survey data and results. Finally, conclusions based on the empirical analysis will be drawn.

Publisher

Corvinus University of Budapest

Reference40 articles.

1. Alasoini, T. (2004): The New Finnish Workplace Development Program (TYKES-FWDP) as an Approach to Innovation. Concepts and Transformation 9(3), p. 279–295.

2. Alasoini, T. – Heikkilä, A. – Ramstad, E. – Ylöstalo, P. (2008): High-Involvement Innovation Practices at Finnish Workplaces – Can a Publicly-Funded R&D Programme Play a Supporting Role? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57(6), p. 449–459.

3. Alasoini, T. – Heikkilä, A. – Ramstad, E. – Ylöstalo, P. (forthcoming): Promotion of Participatory Practices through a Publicly-Funded Programme: Experiences from Finland. In Garibaldo, F. & Telljohann, V. (eds.) The Ambivalent Character of Participation: New Tendencies in Worker Participation in Europe. Frankfurt a/M: Peter Lang

4. Alasoini, T. – Ramstad, E. – Rouhiainen, N. (2005): The Finnish Workplace Development Programme as an Expanding Activity: Results, Challenges, Opportunities. Reports of the Finnish Workplace Development Programme 47. Helsinki: Ministry of Labour

5. Armbruster, H. – Bikfalvi, A. – Kinkel, S. – Lay, G. (2008): Organizational Innovation: The Challenge of Measuring Non-Technical Innovation in Large-Scale Surveys. Technovation 28(10), p. 644–657.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3