Abstract
Higher education degrees from European Union countries are automatically recognised in other Member States. However, legal recognition does not necessarily translate into symbolic recognition in the profession. This dynamic can be observed in the field of medicine in Germany, where German graduates often face symbolic devaluation when they graduate in certain other countries and return to work in Germany. At the same time, the group of foreign medical students is socially exclusive, and admission to a medical programme in Germany is difficult and unsuccessful for many applicants. Based on the theory of symbolic power and capital and a centre–periphery perspective, this paper reconstructs the means and ways by which privileged students from the centre, Germany, seek social reproduction by studying medicine abroad in the semi-periphery, Hungary, Latvia and Romania. The results show that moving to the semi-periphery is only chosen when other alternatives in the centre are not feasible. Certain symbolic disadvantages of studying abroad were identified, and countermeasures were developed to ensure symbolic legitimacy upon return. The results also show that the semi-periphery is not homogeneous in its symbolic ambivalence from a centre–periphery perspective.
Publisher
Corvinus University of Budapest
Reference60 articles.
1. Aksakal, M. – B. Bilecen – K. Schmidt (2019) Qualitative sampling in research on international student mobility: Insights from the field in Germany. Globalisation, Societies and Education, Vol. 17, No. 5., pp. 610–621, DOI:10.1080/14767724.2018.1525282.
2. Astfalk, T. – B. Müller-Hilke (2018) Same same but different – A qualitative study on the development and maintenance of personal networks among German and international medical students. GMS Journal for Medical Education, Vol. 35, No. 5., DOI: 10.3205/zma001204.
3. Bamberger, A. – P. Morris – M. Yemini (2019) Neoliberalism, internationalisation and higher education: Connections, contradictions and alternatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 40, No. 2., pp. 203–216, DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569879.
4. Barnett, G. A. – M. Lee – K. Jiang – H. W. Park (2016) The flow of international students from a macro perspective: A network analysis. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Vol. 46, No. 4., pp. 533–559, DOI:10.1080/03057925.2015.1015965.
5. Bohnsack, R. (2014) Documentary Method. In: Flick, U. (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Chapter 15, pp. 217–233, London (UK), SAGE Publications Inc., DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献