Abstract
Research background: In enterprise practices, innovation management is taking on more and more open forms. New, creative sources of inspiration are being sought. More and more companies are opening up to cooperation with external people or entities, thus entering a path of open innovation and crowdsourcing. This development is facilitated by increasingly large numbers of online and virtual communities. The idea is to use the potential of the crowd — collective intelligence and creativity. As the strategy is still developing, knowledge in this area is limited. There is a paucity of research on the impact of crowdsourcing on R&D departments and their innovative activities.
Purpose of the article: The study aims to determine whether the use of customer support in the form of crowdsourcing affects the innovative activities of R&D departments that implement user-driven innovation (UDI).
Methods: An original questionnaire was used for the study. Fifty-seven R&D departments in Poland participated in the research. A correspondence analysis, performed on the basis of the Burt matrix, was applied for the analysis. The authors also used Cramer's V correlation coefficients. Examination of the acquired correlation coefficients reveals the existence of four distinct categories of enterprises regarding the usage of crowdsourcing and implementation of product innovations, completed R&D projects, employment in R&D departments, and percentage of revenue allocating in R&D works.
Findings & value added: Research has shown that R&D departments positively evaluate the effects of using UDI in market research analyses of customer purchasing behavior. It helps to create or improve products or services offered on the market, especially in the field of customization, using the information from national research and development units at the same time. Their purpose is mainly to increase the product range. The findings can help academics and practitioners improve the body of knowledge about the determinants of innovation activity, especially concerning relationships with customers and user-driven innovation practices.
Publisher
Instytut Badan Gospodarczych / Institute of Economic Research
Reference90 articles.
1. Abdelaty, H., & Weiss, D. (2023). Coping with the heterogeneity of external knowledge sources: Corresponding openness strategies and innovation performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), 100423.
2. Abdi, H. (2003). Multivariate analysis. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman & T. Futing (Eds.). Encyclopaedia for research methods for the social sciences, (pp. 699–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopaedia of measurement and statistics, (pp. 651–657). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Abdi, H., Williams, L. J., & Valentin, D. (2013). Multiple factor analysis: Principal component analysis for multi-table and multi-block data sets. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 5, 149–179.
5. Acar, O. A. (2019). Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation. Research Policy, 48(8), 103716.