A bűnügyi adatgyűjtés néhány fogalmi és szabályozási kérdése

Author:

Székely László GyörgyORCID

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to present some general questions and problems of data gethering in criminal cases in aspect of criminal procedure law and forensic sciences. Methodology: Presentation, analysis, evaulation and drawing conclusions of legal rules, studies, papers, and textbooks in the subject area, both in Hungarian and Anglo-Saxon literature. Findings: Data gathering is a well-known method in both forensic sciences and criminal procedure law. However its meaning is different in these two fields of criminal sciences. Before the current code of criminal procedure in Hungary the meaning and content of data-gathering was similar in forensic science and in legal rules. But the new code has integrated the instruments of crime detection purposed secret information-gathering appliapble before the starting of investigation, and made them criminal procedural instruments under the name of covert instruments. Besides that the new code significantly changed the system and legal rules of „open” data-gathering methods. Nowdays some data-gathering methods only aply as covert instruments with all its strict conditions, consequences and formal rules. In my study first I try to withdraw the conceptual borders of data-gathering and outlines some historical backgrounds. After it I explain the conception and content of data gathering in criminalistic literature, then I examine the rules of data gathering in criminal procedure law. In the end of my paper I summarize the problems of this conceptual dualism. Value: The (open) data gathering in criminal cases as a subject has not been examined recently, so this study can draw attention on the problems of the latest legal regulation and the extension and modernization of criminalistic recomendations.

Publisher

Ministry of Interior of Hungary

Reference39 articles.

1. Angyal M., Balassa B., Bezsenyi T. & Petrétei D. (2019). Kognitív kriminalisztika. Dialóg Campus.

2. Anti Cs., Barta E., Bócz E., Krispán I., Lakatos J. & Romasz Á. (2004). Krimináltaktika I. Rejtjel.

3. Balláné Füszter E., Kunos I. & Lakatos J. (2004). Bevezetés a kriminalisztikába. Rejtjel.

4. Bánáti T. (2022). Rendőrségi adatgyűjtés és adatfelhasználás a profilalkotásban. Belügyi Szemle, 70(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.38146/BSZ.2022.1.6

5. Bócz E. (2011). Adatgyűjtés, felderítés, nyomozás. Belügyi Szemle, 59(4), 61–79.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3