Egyes közlekedési szabályszegésekre vonatkozó közigazgatási bírságolási kérdések

Author:

Haspel Orsolya

Abstract

Aim: The law of misdemeanours, which emerged in the mid-1950s, embodied the legal policy will that administrative substantive offences should be dealt with by means of misdemeanour proceedings. The legal policy objective was not fulfilled, and the institution of administrative fines was 'spawned' by the impetus of the social laws in question as the law of administrative offences developed. Since the beginning of the 21st century, this has been spreading - according to the legislator's unknown intentions - and has typically developed in the direction of objective sanctions. Perhaps most strikingly in traffic regulation. The aim of this paper is to illustrate some of the specific features of administrative fines, limited to traffic rules. Among the administrative sanctions, the author examines those which are applied by the fining authorities for infringements of road traffic rules. The author tries to justify the need to modify the grounds for exemption in the substantive law as it stands, on the one hand, and the regulation of on-the-spot fines, on the other. Methodology: According to the author, the objective can be achieved if the will to codify embraces the objectives set out above. To this end, the methodology of the study is based on an analysis of the relevant legal norm, from which valid deductive assertions are made. Findings: The infringements transferred from the law of misdemeanours to the law on administrative fines require further codification. Value: The study could help to improve the legal framework for dealing with administrative substantive offences.

Publisher

Ministry of Interior of Hungary

Reference11 articles.

1. Balla Z. (2014). A rendészet kérdései. Belügyi Szemle, 62(10), 5–19.

2. Balla Z. (2023). A közigazgatás alapintézményei. Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.

3. Kis N. (2007). Közigazgatási szankciótan. In Gyurita E. R. (Szerk.), Közigazgatási jog III (pp. 23–115). Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Kft.

4. Lamm V. (2012). Jogi lexikon (átdolgozott kiadás). Wolters Kluwer.

5. Madarász T. (1995). A magyar államigazgatási jog alapjai. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3