Abstract
Heritage is commonly understood as denoting sites, objects and traditions that are selected and protected for their uniqueness, monumentality, beauty and/or historical and cultural significance. Heritage, thus, is almost by definition something unquestionably valuable and good, and of outmost importance for our wellbeing and identity. This paper takes a different position and asks what happens if we question heritage’s status as a selected reserve of desired things and traditions. Based on fieldwork conducted in contemporary settlements in the Russian North, it explores how the role and significance we ascribe heritage may come out radically altered upon facing the unruly legacies of the Soviet past.
Reference55 articles.
1. Andreassen, E., H. Bjerck and B. J. Olsen. 2010. Persistent Memories: Pyramiden – A Soviet Mining Town in the High Arctic. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
2. Assmann, A. 2011. “Ghosts of the Past.” East European Memory Studies 8: 1–5.
3. Bangstad, T. and Þ. Pétursdóttir. 2022. Heritage Ecologies. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315101019
4. Bell, J. 2013. “The Politics of Preservation: Privileging One Heritage over Another.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20 (4): 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739113000192
5. Benjamin, W. 1999. The Arcades Project. Trans. H. Eiland and K. McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.