Abstract
When the old power plant at Longyearbyen on Svalbard in the Arctic was decommissioned in 1983, the building was earmarked for demolition. However, the presence of asbestos made the cost of removal too high and the building remained closed for more than 35 years. Now, its fate is once again being examined. Ideas for its potential future include establishment as an industrial memorial, a site for cultural events, a tourist attraction and/or a monument “of fossilised time”. Questions of which past is to be remembered, which uses are acceptable, which materiality is to be kept – and in what condition – all permeate the project, which is called FOSSIL. This paper examines different aspects of the project from both a material perspective (Identity of Place) and a human perspective (place-identity), bringing up questions of politics of memory, museumification, and the desired and undesired facets of heritage that the project engages with as it shapes the power plant’s (re)incarnation.
Reference14 articles.
1. ARTICA and Krunglevi?ius, I. 2022. “Interview with Artica Listens 2021 Artist Ignas Krunglevi?ius.” [video] ARTICA, 22 January [first published 17 November 2021]. Online: https://www.articasvalbard.no/videos/interview-ignas-krungleviius / https://vimeo.com/644369089
2. Brode-Roger, D. Under review. “The Svalbard Treaty and Identity of Place: Impacts and Implications for Longyearbyen, Svalbard.”
3. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
4. DeSilvey, C. 2017. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Hodder, I. 2014 “The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View.” New Literary History 45: 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2014.0005
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献