Abstract
Background: This study examines caregivers’ use of ‘where are you going?’ in Mandarin and Taiwanese to address residents’ wandering-related actions in routine caregiving interactions.
Method: Using multimodal conversation analysis, video recordings of interactions between Taiwanese residents and caregivers from Taiwan and Vietnam are analyzed.
Results: ‘Where are you going?’ accomplishes the following institutional actions: this turn signals residents’ actions as problematic; simultaneously, it aims to halt residents’ actions, draw residents’ attention, and/or hold residents accountable for their actions. Residents respond in one of four ways, suggesting their distinct understandings of the same turn: [+/– halt] and [+/– account]. The caregivers’ subsequent actions indicate their institutional orientation as caregivers. In particular, helping the residents to walk or move their bodies relies on resident–caregiver collaboration.
Discussion/conclusion: This study demonstrates wandering and its management from an emic (participant-oriented) perspective and presents ‘where are you going?’ as a practical non-pharmacological intervention.
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference36 articles.
1. Adekoya, A. A., and Guse, L. (2019). Wandering behavior from the perspectives of older adults with mild to moderate dementia in long-term care. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 12(5), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20190522-01
2. Agrawal, A. K., Gowda, M., Achary, U., Gowda, G. S., and Harbishettar, V. (2021). Approach to management of wandering in dementia: Ethical and legal issue. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(5), S53–S59. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176211030979
3. Backhouse, T., Camino, J., and Mioshi, E. (2018). What do we know about behavioral crises in dementia? A systematic review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 62(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170679
4. Bloch, S., and Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(4), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400005614
5. Burch, A. R. (2016). Motivation in interaction: A conversation-analytic perspective (publication no. 10300241). Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at M?noa. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.