Abstract
OPEN ACCESS-PAID-CC BY-NC-ND
In historically Protestant countries, human skeletal reference collections curated by research institutions have been amassed from bodies dissected by anatomists, typically unclaimed cadavers from morgues and hospitals, or from remains donated to science. In contrast to these anatomy-based and donation-based collections, skeletal reference collections in historically Roman Catholic countries on mainland Europe and in Latin America are for the most part derived from unclaimed remains exhumed from modern cemeteries and ossuaries at the end of the mandated interment period. While much has been written in English about the history, context and ethical framework of anatomy-derived collections, cemetery-based collections have received very little critical attention. The current paper addresses this gap, with particular reference to cemetery-derived collections in Portugal. The cultural and historical context of southern Europe is discussed, particularly Roman Catholic mortuary traditions and the influence of the Napoleonic Code, and these provide the background for an overview of the ethical issues raised by cemetery-derived collections. Here, general principles that should guide the work of human osteologists working in archaeological contexts are relevant, as regards consent, dignity and respect and benefits to science and education, because unlike their anatomy-derived counterparts, cemetery-based collections include individuals who were once buried.
Reference214 articles.
1. Aguado-Henche, S., C. Clemente de Arriba and J. Carrascosa-Sánchez. 2015. "Densitometric Analysis of the Human Ulna." International Journal of Morphology 33 (3): 902-907. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022015000300016
2. Ahrndt, W., C. Deimel, M. Geißdorf, C. Lenk, S. Roeßiger, W. Rosendahl, A. Schaluschke, M. Schindlbeck, T. Schnalke, C. Thielecke, C. von Selle, A. Wesche and U. Wittwer-Backofen. 2013. Recommendations for the Care of Human Remains in Museums and Collections. Berlin: Deutscher Museumsbund. Available onoine: http://www.concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/TO/296.pdf
3. Albanese, J. 2003. Identified Skeletal Reference Collections and the Study of Human Variation. PhD diss., University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
4. ____. 2018. "The Grant Human Skeletal Collection and Other Contributions of J. C. B. Grant to Anatomy, Osteology, and Forensic Anthropology." In Identified Skeletal Collections: The Testing Ground of Anthropology, edited by C. Y. Henderson and F. A. Cardoso, 35-57. Oxford: Archaeopress.
5. Alemán, I., J. Irurita, A. R. Valencia, A. Martínez, S. Lõpez-Lázaro, J. Viciano and M. C. Botella. 2012. "Brief Communication: The Granada Osteological Collection of Identified Infants and Young Children." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 149 (4): 606-610. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22165
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献