Abstract
This article argues that discussions on the biblical interpretation issues that underpin the problematic expressions of the prosperity gospel within Pentecostalism have been helpful. However, given the affect-economic nexus in passages like 1 Tim 6.10, the article also contends that there need to be discussions addressing the affect-related matters of desire, denial, and the mirroring of consumer culture that often characterize these problematic expressions. Therefore, the article will discuss how a combined reading of the affect-related concepts in René Girard’s mimetic theory and Steven Jack Land’s assessment of Pentecostal spirituality can be used as a heuristic device to examine Pentecostal engagement with the prosperity gospel phenomenon. Finally, the article will claim that this combined reading can be instrumental to Pentecostal discernment regarding the contours of a sound Pentecostal engagement with the prosperity gospel.
Reference40 articles.
1. The Palgrave Handbook of Mimetic Theory and Religion
2. Introduction: The Plurality of Prosperity Theologies and Pentecostalisms
3. Pentecost and Prosperity in Eastern Europe: Between Sharing of Possessions and Accumulating Personal Wealth
4. Augustine, Daniela C. The Spirit and the Common Good. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2019. Kindle.
5. Bowman, Robert M., Jr. The Word-Faith Controversy: Understanding the Health and Wealth Gospel. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2001.