Author:
Willemsen Annerose,Gosen Myrte,Koole Tom,De Glopper Kees
Abstract
This paper addresses the ways in which teachers in whole-class discussions invite students to elaborate their previous turn. Our conversation analytic study uncovers that the teachers’ invitations are prompted by elicited as well as spontaneous student turns of both subjective and factual nature. While giving the students the space to expand on their previous turn, most invitations nevertheless steer towards a specific type of response, namely an account or explanation. Only incidentally, the invitations simply solicit a continuation. The fact that the invitations follow not only teacher-initiated, but also student-initiated contributions reflects the teachers’ attempts to foster an actual discussion framework in which they partly hand over control and in which the student contributions are taken up for further consideration.
Reference42 articles.
1. Antaki, C. (1996). Explanation slots as resources in interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01105.x
2. Bargh, J. A. & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
3. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (1st edition). Portsmouth, N.H: Heinemann Educational Books.
4. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
5. Damhuis, R., De Blauw, A. & Brandenbarg, N. (2004). CombiList, een instrument voor taalontwikkeling via interactie: Praktische vaardigheden voor leidsters en leerkrachten. Nijmegen: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献