Restorative justice as diversion for adult offenders in Queensland, 1990–2021

Author:

Price Stephanie,Prenzler Tim,McKillop Nadine,Rayment-McHugh Susan

Abstract

This article provides a summary history and critique of the Queensland experience of restorative justice for adult offenders, with a focus on policy development and program implementation. It aims to identify key lessons to improve policy and implementation that may be transferrable to similar jurisdictions. Public source material was analysed to identify significant moments of change, including the launch of programs, the political rhetoric and commentary, as well as key activity data (e.g. referral rates). Results identified a significant lack of program uptake, with limited referral rates hindering the utilisation of restorative justice as an effective diversionary mechanism for adult offending in Queensland. In terms of both diversion and prevention, the study was restricted by a lack of data, indicating a significant practice and research gap, hence the need for enhanced research, increased application and greater transparency. Combined with a review of the literature, the results suggest the need for a greater focus on the welfare needs of victims and offenders to improve client and program outcomes, and reduce reoffending.

Publisher

Equinox Publishing

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,History,Cultural Studies

Reference49 articles.

1. Australian Institute of Criminology 2004. ‘Restorative justice as a crime prevention measure.’ AICrime Prevention Matters, no. 20.

2. Bazemore, G and Elis, L 2007. ‘Evaluation of restorative justice’, in G Johnstone and DW Van Ness (eds), Handbook of restorative justice, Willan, Cullompton, pp. 397–425.

3. Begley, T and Sykes, E 2013. ‘Finally facing justice’, ABC Local, 26 April.

4. Braithwaite, J & Strang, H 2001. Restorative justice and civil society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

5. Browning, M 2010. Interim evaluation report: Mornington Island Restorative Justice (MIRJ) Project, Department of Justice and Attorney-General, Dispute Resolution Branch, Brisbane.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A review of restorative justice programmes for First Nations Peoples in Queensland;International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice;2024-02-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3